tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post1705344687481075812..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: The Safety and Security of SocietyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-70295582442711434162012-10-23T16:31:20.263+02:002012-10-23T16:31:20.263+02:00Mikeb, why do you keep trotting out that foolishne...Mikeb, why do you keep trotting out that foolishness?<br /><br />1. Children have limited rights. They have to be cared for and guided into adulthood. The rights that we discuss here are primarily for adults.<br /><br />2. Missiles clearly don't fit the intent of arms in the Second Amendment. They don't fit into the traditions of owning and carrying weapons by individuals.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-66194232199721600852012-10-23T14:54:02.461+02:002012-10-23T14:54:02.461+02:00So, for you, 10-year-olds can buy guns, surface to...So, for you, 10-year-olds can buy guns, surface to air missiles included?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-33077066033916850252012-10-23T14:13:43.320+02:002012-10-23T14:13:43.320+02:00Scalia was wrong. No other amendment says "sh...Scalia was wrong. No other amendment says "shall not be infringed". If you look up the definition of infringed, it becomes clear, the Second Amendment IS absolute, and it means what it says. People can own and bear small arms as they see fit, and government is prohibited from limiting that in ANY way, shape, or form. It is past time for government to obey the law.Blkwdw86https://www.blogger.com/profile/04093001672341838227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-89538844488651407922012-10-23T10:05:49.537+02:002012-10-23T10:05:49.537+02:00So if the supreme court justices don't believe...So if the supreme court justices don't believe that any (apparantly) of the constitution means crap, why even have a supreme court?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-87329269498237686592012-10-23T07:37:10.837+02:002012-10-23T07:37:10.837+02:00And we're supposed to be shocked that yet anot...And we're supposed to be shocked that yet another newspaper exercises its right of free expression and the press to call for another right to be infringed? Well, gee, that's never happened before...<br /><br />As newspapers become increasingly irrelevant, they're just going to squawk all the louder--ultimately about how no one is listening to them any more.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com