tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post176455841775162612..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Loopholes Loopholes EverywhereAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-814350848950536562010-06-01T04:18:29.044+02:002010-06-01T04:18:29.044+02:00If the act in question is already a felony then NO...If the act in question is already a felony then NO LOOPHOLE EXISTS!<br /><br />Apparently democommie is unable to understand this simple fact.Mike W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03425962910696301026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-45144514481944029912010-05-31T14:45:20.196+02:002010-05-31T14:45:20.196+02:00Oh, noes! FatWhiteMan said something mean AND per...Oh, noes! FatWhiteMan said something mean AND personal about me. Quick, mikey, rat him out to Mikeb30200. I know how much it twists your knickers when people are impolite on this blog. Oh, drat, I forgot, that's only when it's anti-assholeswithgunz folks who are making the comments. Nevamind.<br /><br />BTW, Mikeb30200; the fact that a loophole in one state allows someone from another state to commit a felony--in two states--does not make it less/more than a loophole.democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-58530366928157400292010-05-31T08:33:46.673+02:002010-05-31T08:33:46.673+02:00No doubt about it, they're over-using the word...No doubt about it, they're over-using the word "loophole."Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-45279982603936301742010-05-31T01:38:09.649+02:002010-05-31T01:38:09.649+02:00"It would be really nice if everybody that ow...<i>"It would be really nice if everybody that owns a gun, legally or otherwise, could be fitted with, like, oneathem explody dyepacks that they put on banknotes. Then when they became weregunners they would be easily identifiable."</i><br /><br />Good idea. We just recognize your ilk by the smell.FatWhiteManhttp://fatwhiteman.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-38453415237129301732010-05-31T00:37:51.718+02:002010-05-31T00:37:51.718+02:00Uhh, if he crossed state lines and committed a fel...Uhh, if he crossed state lines and committed a felony, that is not a loophole.Mike W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03425962910696301026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-1564306589715198822010-05-30T18:15:34.544+02:002010-05-30T18:15:34.544+02:00Fishy Jay: “I think that they meant to say "g...Fishy Jay: “I think that they meant to say "gun show" (the cause du jour) somewhere, but someone forgot.”<br /><br />And even then they would forget to mention that even the private gun show sellers need to ask the question if they are a resident of the state. I’m not sure where they are getting this “no questions asked” line from.TSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-79134483163057369582010-05-30T17:51:19.680+02:002010-05-30T17:51:19.680+02:00And, as usual, Dickan was a law abiding citizen un...And, as usual, Dickan was a law abiding citizen until he turned violent over a FRIGGING PHONE BILL and then became homicidal after having his GOD GIVEN right to a handgun yanked for being a bully with said handgun. <br /><br />It would be really nice if everybody that owns a gun, legally or otherwise, could be fitted with, like, oneathem explody dyepacks that they put on banknotes. Then when they became weregunners they would be easily identifiable.democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-71164670534124246252010-05-30T16:25:19.594+02:002010-05-30T16:25:19.594+02:00From the article:
"They say it could be an e...From the article:<br /><br />"They say it could be an example of the loophole law. People cross state lines and buy guns with cash, no questions asked." <br /><br />"Police are still looking for where Dickan obtained the gun he used in Thursday's shooting."<br /><br />1) We again see the now-standard procedure of gun control advocates: No one yet really knows the facts, yet they claim that it "could" be be due to their cause du jour. At least they said "could" -- that's more honest than some others.<br /><br />2) It's already illegal for people to "cross state lines and buy guns with cash, no questions asked" from a gun dealer. I think that they meant to say "gun show" (the cause du jour) somewhere, but someone forgot.FishyJaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-72666450161971409482010-05-30T14:42:08.462+02:002010-05-30T14:42:08.462+02:00Of course there is a loophole. Every time, and it ...Of course there is a loophole. Every time, and it is very very often, that gun control fails then there must be a loophole. <br /><br />I mean, it couldn't be that criminals don't obey those silly laws could it? It must be a loophole.<br /><br />Typical liberal response: always blame someone else for your failures.<br /><br />I say we go further and use MikeBs victim is responsible theory. Had those people switched to Verizon, they wouldn't have been there. I know, its Apple's fault. We must close the iPhone loophole. Racists!FatWhiteManhttp://fatwhiteman.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-78478944648817935772010-05-30T14:23:37.700+02:002010-05-30T14:23:37.700+02:00Where was Eddie Eagle when Mr. Dickan needed his s...Where was Eddie Eagle when Mr. Dickan needed his sage counsel?<br /><br />According to a related article, the local police chief (New York Mills) did not know that Dickan had threatened (apparently repeatedly) AT&T employees prompting the revocation of his pistol permit. This is the same AT&T that has happily allowed the Bush administration (and quite possibly the Obama administration) to wiretap other citizens who were not, in fact, threatening them--or anyone else.<br /><br />"There isn't a loophole," says Tom King, President of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association. "It's not a gun issue, it's an enforcement issue."<br /><br />Well, shucks, he's right! And the best way to make sure that nobody has any illegal guns is to conduct house to house, room by room searches of every habitation in the state--as well as all manufacturing, commercial and farm buildings--to ensure that all guns are properly stored and secured. Amen.democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-50157443618998472202010-05-30T12:25:42.755+02:002010-05-30T12:25:42.755+02:00But if the gun was illegal, how was there a loopho...But if the gun was illegal, how was there a loophole?Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.com