tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post2443457945244981316..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Four Dead in Pennsylvania ShootingAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-74361671381739918612012-12-25T13:25:59.391+01:002012-12-25T13:25:59.391+01:00Suck-boy? What does that even mean? On second th...Suck-boy? What does that even mean? On second thought, don't explain. Just see what I've told you about how your side acts.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-28994190255168333522012-12-24T17:44:07.554+01:002012-12-24T17:44:07.554+01:00Anonymous, you're being a good Wayne La Pierre...Anonymous, you're being a good Wayne La Pierre suck-boy. The official theme now is "we need to arm more people."Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-64622840044912183662012-12-23T18:20:49.333+01:002012-12-23T18:20:49.333+01:00The attacker's criminal record before this att...The attacker's criminal record before this attack does not matter: the police did not prevent this crime. And the police could not prevent the crime regardless of whether the attacker used a steel pipe or a firearm. The only person that could have prevented this crime and saved that woman's life was that woman herself ... and she almost certainly would have needed a firearm to do that. Sadly, she did not have the means to defend herself and paid the price with her life.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-46489621137418561472012-12-23T16:48:44.267+01:002012-12-23T16:48:44.267+01:00Mikeb, you don't know anything about this man....Mikeb, you don't know anything about this man. Your speculation that he was a lawful gun owner before this event is not evidence.<br /><br />But if someone has no criminal record and hasn't been found to be a danger to others, on what grounds would you deny that person a right? Your glib proposals ignore this fundamental question.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-67516269113687334432012-12-23T11:45:47.606+01:002012-12-23T11:45:47.606+01:00He wasn't a criminal until he did this. That ...He wasn't a criminal until he did this. That means up until yesterday you were preaching that he should be armed to protect himself. Do you see the problem?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-70576169961369860662012-12-23T04:37:39.015+01:002012-12-23T04:37:39.015+01:00How horrible. Sadly, the outcome could have been ...How horrible. Sadly, the outcome could have been much better.<br /><br />Two things are obvious to me. First, the criminal could have just as easily killed the first victim (a women decorating a small church) with a steel pipe or baseball bat. Second, regardless of whatever weapon the criminal used to kill that first victim, police were unable to prevent it.<br /><br />That women's best option to defend herself was her own firearm. Apparently she didn't have one and now she is dead. I will never understand why most people -- especially women, physically handicapped, and elderly -- go through life unarmed and unable to defend themselves from violent attackers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-43278444442598124972012-12-22T23:15:05.048+01:002012-12-22T23:15:05.048+01:00Remember the Second Amendment! To Keep it Holy!Remember the Second Amendment! To Keep it Holy!Grung_e_Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01894879088472559055noreply@blogger.com