tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post2479993679773665346..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: The National Guard being a creature of Federal law.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger48125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-20909085966163447532013-09-21T17:28:53.550+02:002013-09-21T17:28:53.550+02:00Ambiguous, but it was included. If you guys were r...Ambiguous, but it was included. If you guys were right, it would have been excluded.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-43745473886057144112013-09-20T02:35:12.664+02:002013-09-20T02:35:12.664+02:00Is there another Jim here? Did you just not refer ...Is there another Jim here? Did you just not refer to yourself as "Maybe Jim is a professor"?<br /><br />Do you suffer from DID (dissociative identity disorder)? Check your meds man. Seriously.Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-71134368117528480202013-09-19T23:38:57.874+02:002013-09-19T23:38:57.874+02:00Open dishonesty. Anyone else want to read my comme...Open dishonesty. Anyone else want to read my comment and show where I said I was a professor? Try that wild west question again. You have flunked so far. Must be a student of the fake professor. Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-20824335298996868162013-09-19T17:22:11.529+02:002013-09-19T17:22:11.529+02:00Jim, let me get this straight, you are a professor...Jim, let me get this straight, you are a professor and your graduates have no clue? Is that an admission? I have never heard anyone so openly admit that they are a failure at teaching.<br /><br />But given the responses from you, I shouldn't be surprised.Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-32155005877252842292013-09-19T17:16:28.938+02:002013-09-19T17:16:28.938+02:00In a way it is a bit ambiguous Mike, as the militi...In a way it is a bit ambiguous Mike, as the militia clause is in there to be a foreseen need. If needed that is and for the reason of security. But the right to keep and bear for the individual is a solid phrase that means what it says. <br /><br />The right belongs to the individual and for any reason the individual sees fit and that also includes the militia purpose. Any reason that the individual sees fit means for survival (hunting for example) or personal security (to defend oneself from attack) or other sporting purposes. It IS NOT a protection for unlawful use and those conditions are also spelled out in other parts of the constitution. It is the same today as it was the day it was written.Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-87320247814614543442013-09-19T10:27:26.912+02:002013-09-19T10:27:26.912+02:00Yes, that is goal you hold forth, but saying that ...Yes, that is goal you hold forth, but saying that you are going to ban a product, in all forms, because it can be misused with devastating results is quite different from saying that if you are going to make a product, you have to comply with certain regulations so that it doesn't poison or otherwise harm users who are using it properly.<br /><br /><br />As for the issue itself, you have said that you would like to see a ban based on California's, but you haven't specified your changes you would like to see, or why we should have either the tests under California law, or the tests you might utilize in the law you base on theirs. You leave us arguing against a vapor--if we attack California's, you can just say, "We need something better than that," but you don't specify, so there is nothing to say for or against your concept.<br /><br />Why not work on the issue, read up on the guns and ammo, and make your proposal if you think such a law is so necessary?Tennesseannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-83271336250328756102013-09-19T10:11:41.181+02:002013-09-19T10:11:41.181+02:00My response in this post:
http://mikeb302000.blog...My response in this post:<br /><br />http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2013/09/texas-parents-freak-out-over-mention-of.htmlTennesseannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-16168828701851139772013-09-19T09:45:19.167+02:002013-09-19T09:45:19.167+02:00Can I say something about the militia phrase of th...Can I say something about the militia phrase of the 2A? It's ambiguous.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-74405515174605316572013-09-19T09:43:18.997+02:002013-09-19T09:43:18.997+02:00Assault weapons bans are supposed to prevent peopl...Assault weapons bans are supposed to prevent people from owning weapons that have a high (military) capacity for killing. That's the reason, whether you agree with it or not, and whether you can name inconsistencies in its application or not.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-75146941633469471132013-09-19T09:37:27.766+02:002013-09-19T09:37:27.766+02:00T., whenever you start out a comment with, "I...T., whenever you start out a comment with, "IN brief,..." my brain freezes up.<br /><br />Greg, you lost me about the trust thing. Yes, I mock open carry and yes, I don't think even the wildest stretch of your gun rights includes concealed carry.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-23365328654551703572013-09-19T08:43:59.656+02:002013-09-19T08:43:59.656+02:00Maybe Jim is a professor. It would certainly expla...Maybe Jim is a professor. It would certainly explain why so many graduates have no clue about most things. Like being able to name the president. I love those "Jaywalk" bits on Leno; proving we have an educated(?) idiot society. Not to mention fake professor doesn't even know the meaning of "push." I never thought this site would turn out to be a comedy site, as far as the daily NRA dupes are concerned. Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-9882378080271423902013-09-19T06:19:40.707+02:002013-09-19T06:19:40.707+02:00What, no toaster?What, no toaster?Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-22602086781181353772013-09-19T06:05:59.271+02:002013-09-19T06:05:59.271+02:00So I guess you insist on remaining to be a element...So I guess you insist on remaining to be a elementery school yard bully. No Jim the professor, eh? Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-12912211142788355872013-09-19T02:54:55.985+02:002013-09-19T02:54:55.985+02:00Because YOU said so. Do you always say things, the...Because YOU said so. Do you always say things, then say that's not your position. <br />Light bulbs. HA HA HA HA HA HAJimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-18460379634816302062013-09-18T20:10:13.443+02:002013-09-18T20:10:13.443+02:00Got evidence of these "tens of millions"...Got evidence of these "tens of millions" Jim? And how do you find it to be "my" interpretation? Also, how is it "my" position? Its the Bill of Rights after all. Its not my writing. <br /><br />Ok, give me an example of another way to phrase the second amendment without commas and without changing its meaning.<br /><br />Show me "Jim the professor" rather than "Jim the heckler". Show me how your going to burst my bubble. Or are just going to insist on remaining a elementary schoolyard bully. Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-88901239825694648832013-09-18T19:38:55.026+02:002013-09-18T19:38:55.026+02:00Right, I'm the only one who disagrees with you...Right, I'm the only one who disagrees with your position. HA HA HA HA HA HA<br />Sorry to burst your bubble, but tens of millions disagree with your "interpretation." Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-78912439086658663952013-09-18T15:10:03.401+02:002013-09-18T15:10:03.401+02:00Nope, its not wrong and nope, I didn't take an...Nope, its not wrong and nope, I didn't take any classes from Greg. But I do understand English and structure. In fact any 4th grader already understands proper structure.<br /><br />Everyone out of step but you Jim?Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-90987896627391297422013-09-18T05:38:39.712+02:002013-09-18T05:38:39.712+02:00Your example is wrong. You must be taking English ...Your example is wrong. You must be taking English from the fake professor NRA Greg. Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-28915809794829455872013-09-17T20:15:55.405+02:002013-09-17T20:15:55.405+02:00Mike, it seems Jim has your number too. Toasters.
...Mike, it seems Jim has your number too. Toasters.<br /><br />I mentioned the government ban on certain light bulbs, you mentioned the government ban on certain toasters. Now he mocks us both. See why I don't like sides? This is one example.<br /><br />Both were banned for producing something toxic. The toaster for its fumes. The light bulbs for green house gas. Both for the assumed protection of the public.<br /><br />But neither produce anything toxic just sitting there. Just like the AR15 doesn't do anything just sitting there. When the AR15 is used however, the only thing it produces is what the person holding it determines. Good reasons in the hands of a good guy, or bad reasons for the bad guy. The gun itself doesn't make that determination. So what is all the phobia surrounding the gun? Isn't it the user that you should be concerned about? Isn't the same for ANY firearm? Since the AR15 does not function any differently than any other semi-auto hunting gun or semi pistol, what is so special about targeting a certain gun, the way it looks?<br /><br />Should we target certain furniture, cars, houses, colors of paint, fabrics or even people just because we don't like the way they look? We all have a choice. Some like the looks of certain trucks/cars that I find revolting. There are some guns I wont buy just because I don't like the looks of them either, but function exactly like the ones I do like the looks of. But should that lead to a ban of either?<br /><br />Please explain the target of certain guns like the AR, AK or even others that look similar.<br /><br />Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-62486644634465145232013-09-17T19:46:54.546+02:002013-09-17T19:46:54.546+02:00Jim says,
"Thanks for showing that the comm...Jim says,<br /><br /> "Thanks for showing that the comma makes all the difference in the understanding of the 2nd amendment, but sorry, you cannot just remove it." <br /><br />Thanks for agreeing with me. Seems, at least you do understand the comma cant be removed for the phrase to be understandable in its current structure.<br /><br />My example was that if the comma were to be removed and to keep the same meaning, then the phrase structure has to be changed.<br /><br />Jim says,<br /><br />"Lets change the 2nd amendment to say what YOU want it to say."<br /><br />Actually the restructure didn't change the meaning, it says the same thing without the commas, but I thought you got that? It doesn't make it say what I want it to say. The meaning is the same.<br />Texas Colt carrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-70792399996531731112013-09-17T18:50:56.536+02:002013-09-17T18:50:56.536+02:00You're still taking a huge jump from requiring...You're still taking a huge jump from requiring that people use safe materials to manufacture products to claiming authority to ban entire products for certain classes of people, in spite of Constitutional protections of the ownership of arms for use in the militia.Tennesseannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-39821189090017080592013-09-17T17:49:08.446+02:002013-09-17T17:49:08.446+02:00The AR-15 isn't toxic! It shoots just fine, w...The AR-15 isn't toxic! It shoots just fine, without poisoning it's user.<br /><br />And I guess you've never heard of proof marks. Firearms have had them for centuries. Nobody wants guns to blow up in their face.TShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04667036856347626234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-46686930033424928512013-09-17T17:40:49.793+02:002013-09-17T17:40:49.793+02:00Mikeb, explain how a firearm can be functional wit...Mikeb, explain how a firearm can be functional without also being a weapon. Again, we see that your real goal is to remove all firearms from private hands.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-74741072644809567782013-09-17T17:38:05.144+02:002013-09-17T17:38:05.144+02:00Mikeb, you mock open carry, but here you imply tha...Mikeb, you mock open carry, but here you imply that concealed carry isn't an expression of the right. And you wonder why we don't trust you.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-81509192521076222492013-09-17T16:32:40.017+02:002013-09-17T16:32:40.017+02:00Light bulbs and toasters, OH MY!
"So, lets r...Light bulbs and toasters, OH MY!<br /><br />"So, lets remove the commas and restructure the second civil right."<br /><br />Lets change the 2nd amendment to say what YOU want it to say. Thanks for showing that the comma makes all the difference in the understanding of the 2nd amendment, but sorry, you cannot just remove it. Jimnoreply@blogger.com