tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post4091382512513462479..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Can Magazine Capacity Limitations Save Lives?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger89125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-26554290576324083052014-11-01T00:25:16.602+01:002014-11-01T00:25:16.602+01:00I have more on this here.I have more on this <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/a-little-ingenuity-renders-colorado-high-capacity-magazine-ban-toothless" rel="nofollow">here</a>.Kurt '45superman' Hofmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14091930034162667742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-57761264025317330192014-10-31T19:07:07.356+01:002014-10-31T19:07:07.356+01:00Its OK SS, anti anon wouldn't know the facts i...Its OK SS, anti anon wouldn't know the facts if they slapped him square in the face, or would just claim it was the wind blowing instead. He is a typical head in the sand denier. Deny, deny, deny. If he denies it enough then it must become true in his head. He cant figure out that the lack of evidence is evidence in and of itself.<br /><br />Gas tank is empty (to a reasonable person as to why the car doesn't run).<br />You have no evidence the tank ever had gas in it ( a deniers response to the reason of why the car doesn't run, it must be another reason not found yet).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-59227518104538851932014-10-31T18:48:43.552+01:002014-10-31T18:48:43.552+01:00"Why should we give killers the chance to kil..."Why should we give killers the chance to kill even more people? "<br /><br />We should NOT give killers the chance to kill more people, since you've named them killers, that must mean they have killed before and should be locked up, not out on the streets. If you have the means to identify someone as a killer BEFORE they kill, then you have the ability to lock them up before they can kill and keep them locked up. Let us know how well that works out for you.<br /><br />We should NOT be limiting the law abiding the tools to defend ourselves from these killers that you have let back out onto the streets. Your actions and laws WILL NOT STOP those who are intent in committing crimes from obtaining these tools but will disable the law abiding and innocent from the ability to defend from those criminals that have the means anyway to commit those crimes.<br /><br />Those "high capacity" standard mags are here and have been here for a very long time and likely number in the billions. This country, even by every effort humanly possible, could never rid itself from them. Even if all production of them stopped here in the US, the supply already in the hands of the people AND governments will last for centuries. Even if you stopped the imports of them, they will still find their way onto our shores. That means the criminals will ALWAYS find them. <br /><br />All your laws and actions will do is create a safe environment for the criminal to operate in and have more victims by preventing them from having any proper ability to defend themselves. Every law maker out there KNOWS this, but there are those that wish to do "something" even if its wrong, which is usually to make a name for themselves and which does nothing but further endanger the people.<br /><br />And no, its not an "imaginary right", its very real.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-937795030182964892014-10-31T14:14:39.743+01:002014-10-31T14:14:39.743+01:00Hey--wanna see something hilarious (and uplifting)...Hey--wanna see something hilarious (and <b>uplifting</b>)? In Colorado, with its ban of 16-round and larger magazines, good people are <a href="http://denver.cbslocal.com/2014/10/30/many-circumventing-colorado-high-capacity-magazine-ban/" rel="nofollow"><i>still</i> legally buying magazines</a> that can be very easily and quickly restored from the low, 15-round capacity, to the normal, 30-round full capacity:<br /><br /><i>At a northern Colorado gun show, a seller displayed an entire table full of 30 round magazines that had been “retrofitted” to hold 15 rounds and comply with the controversial law.<br /><br />The seller was asked if anyone would care if a buyer removed the modification and turned the magazine back into a high capacity unit.<br /><br />“No, but I gotta be careful about how I say things because they would love nothing more than to make me a poster child so I’m very careful on how I say things.”<br /><br />The CBS4 producer bought a 30 round magazine for $20.</i><br /><br />Or you can buy "kits" (basically magazine parts), and assemble a magazine of useful capacity in seconds:<br /><br /><i>In Colorado Springs at Old Colorado City Surplus, an Army Surplus store, a CBS4 producer bought two brand-new high capacity magazine “kits.”<br /><br />The kits consist of the magazine hardware and a spring that needs to be inserted to make the unit operational.<br /><br />The clerk opened the package, put it together in 24 seconds and sold CBS4 the 30 round magazine for $25.</i><br /><br />For maximum enjoyment, be sure to watch the video, and have a good guffaw about the "reporter's" breathless, bed-wetting horror, and listen to Tom Mauser bleating about how "disgusted" he is.<br /><br />This part is good, too:<br /><br /><i>“We have to do something to not make it easy to have people mowed down by crazed shooters. I thought it would be an effective law,” said Mauser.</i><br /><br />Get it? He "thought it would be an effective law." Isn't that a riot? <br /><br />That's one of "gun control's" problems. Gun rights advocates hold not only <i>all</i> of the moral high ground, but the ease with which we render these idiotic laws toothless shows that we're vastly more <i>intelligent</i> than the gun restriction zealots, too.Kurt '45superman' Hofmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14091930034162667742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-47622550313016201222014-10-24T15:23:27.298+02:002014-10-24T15:23:27.298+02:00I said you go first and I will counter you two to ...I said you go first and I will counter you two to one. Your the one that first claimed you proved it before so show it, coward. Second, I didn't say you were here six years, I said I was. Learn comprehension and then read. And no, I am not GC. Idiot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-79013546475648237542014-10-24T02:23:13.707+02:002014-10-24T02:23:13.707+02:00You are the one who made to claim, where is YOUR p...You are the one who made to claim, where is YOUR proof ? I don't play your games GC and I haven't been here 6 years so add another lie to your list, or is it just stupidity, not a lie. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-18245708944121507062014-10-23T19:32:22.320+02:002014-10-23T19:32:22.320+02:00Read the archives for an anon post?? Yeah right. L...Read the archives for an anon post?? Yeah right. Look you need to prove it or shut up. Provide the link or slink away. I have been reading and posting here for over six years and no one, NONE have proved that smaller mags save lives, none. There are plenty of examples to the contrary. So put up or shut up. And for every example that you provide, if any, I will be generous and provide two to the contrary. Now be honest yourself, provide them, or your a liar.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-23547955179239165962014-10-23T04:30:54.190+02:002014-10-23T04:30:54.190+02:00When you have no clue because you haven't read...When you have no clue because you haven't read, or more likely haven't paid attention, only an idiot claims to know, as you just did. Read the archives, not my job to do your homework. You are to stupid to try and teach, you will have to learn on your own. You didn't PROVE your claim and I wonder why you expect people to do what you refuse to do. Take your dishonest games back to elementary school. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-20360492801886209672014-10-22T19:31:52.291+02:002014-10-22T19:31:52.291+02:00What a LIAR!
"I have many times on this site...What a LIAR!<br /><br />"I have many times on this site. Pay attention OH uneducated one."<br /><br />PROVE IT! Oh bloviated one. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-28389002243247749082014-10-20T19:40:41.079+02:002014-10-20T19:40:41.079+02:00And that's all you got, what a loser.And that's all you got, what a loser. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-56109436489041938622014-10-17T18:40:14.713+02:002014-10-17T18:40:14.713+02:00I have many times on this site. Pay attention OH u...I have many times on this site. Pay attention OH uneducated one. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-52377126966334906202014-10-16T21:07:00.785+02:002014-10-16T21:07:00.785+02:00Show the proof, just don't claim it. I can sho...Show the proof, just don't claim it. I can show PLENTY of proof to the contrary. You first, O educated one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-60678869294976333412014-10-16T20:24:25.769+02:002014-10-16T20:24:25.769+02:00Yes it is proven. Educate yourself. Yes it is proven. Educate yourself. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-17567522931019622512014-10-16T14:07:53.975+02:002014-10-16T14:07:53.975+02:00That's NOT why the law was allowed to lapse. I...That's NOT why the law was allowed to lapse. I don't doubt there was any evidence one way, or the other. It was a political decision which had nothing to do with evidence as you just statedthere was no evidence. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-25610785503460373052014-10-16T00:05:46.522+02:002014-10-16T00:05:46.522+02:00"The Task Force on Community Preventive Servi...<br /><br /><br />"The Task Force on Community Preventive Services, an independent, non-federal task force, examined an assortment of firearms laws, including the AWB, and found "insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence." [11] A 2004 critical review of firearms research by a National Research Council committee said that an academic study of the assault weapon ban "did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence outcomes." The committee noted that the study's authors said the guns were used criminally with relative rarity before the ban and that its maximum potential effect on gun violence outcomes would be very small."<br />http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#Efforts_to_renew_the_ban<br /><br />I personally think sun setting laws should be done more often. If it doesn't work, then it could die a well deserved death, just like this law.ssgmarkcrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14480230040370709682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-80313929439797423652014-10-16T00:04:36.559+02:002014-10-16T00:04:36.559+02:00Proven, hah! What a lie.Proven, hah! What a lie.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-75925059691273543582014-10-15T18:40:46.415+02:002014-10-15T18:40:46.415+02:00Yes, it is. So I won't bother to argue the pro...Yes, it is. So I won't bother to argue the proven fact that small capacity magazines save lives.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-71825698024002225662014-10-15T15:26:38.430+02:002014-10-15T15:26:38.430+02:00I know its a waste of time to argue with irrefutab...I know its a waste of time to argue with irrefutable facts, isn't it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-88613411290757159202014-10-15T03:38:11.815+02:002014-10-15T03:38:11.815+02:00That's the level you think on so there it'...That's the level you think on so there it's a waste of time to say much else. Enjoy your delusions. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-11746689564750989162014-10-14T21:03:35.174+02:002014-10-14T21:03:35.174+02:00That's the best you have?? Michael Savage? Rea...That's the best you have?? Michael Savage? Really?? LOLOLOLs I expected more idiocy from you than this and this is all you can muster? <br /><br />It just shows EVERYONE that the truth cannot be argued against except by a lunatic that really has no argument in the face of facts.<br /><br />Michael Savage,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, why didn't you include Rush Limbaugh, Mark Davis, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, FOX News and a whole host of others in your little diddy bag. <br /><br />Come on man, you could do better! Or not. I LOVE to argue with people like you. You have REALLY disappointed me! Come on, GIVE IT TO ME!! Or is it you that has NO clue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-44990197719064141752014-10-14T08:23:15.425+02:002014-10-14T08:23:15.425+02:00You have no clue what you are talking about, so ju...You have no clue what you are talking about, so just keep spouting your delusion. You are missing Michael Savage while you are spewing your delusions here. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-72270703328235423872014-10-13T21:20:20.319+02:002014-10-13T21:20:20.319+02:00And just how do they NOT have the same responsibil...And just how do they NOT have the same responsibilities? <br />The police have the gun to defend themselves from those that seek to harm them. <br />The average citizen have the gun to defend themselves from those that seek to harm them.<br />I don't see any difference there at all, with the exception that the police have the duty to seek out those that have already harmed others.<br /><br />The average citizen has the responsibility to defend themselves FIRST. They, the individuals, ARE the first responder. Their duty is to protect themselves, their family and their property.<br />The police have NO duty to protect the individual, only the community at large. The police are the SECOND responder to any crime committed and their duty is to protect the community at large from the criminal that has already committed a crime by hunting them down and bringing them to justice. Which by the way is already too late for the individual who has been the victim of the crime in which the victim could not, would not or has been prevented from successfully defending themselves.<br /><br />The only delusional thinking here is that you cant see that. Especially since the courts have frequently affirmed this very fact.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-46132587339470151102014-10-12T13:59:35.302+02:002014-10-12T13:59:35.302+02:00Another dishonest response SS. The bill was not al...Another dishonest response SS. The bill was not allowed to expire BECAUSE there was no discernible effect on violence from assault weapons. Please cite me the proof that it was. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-40950472931892207682014-10-12T04:47:29.255+02:002014-10-12T04:47:29.255+02:00"A simple solution which would work."
..."A simple solution which would work."<br /><br /> Sorry, There was a ban in place for ten years and it was allowed to sunset because there was no discernible effect on violent crime.ssgmarkcrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14480230040370709682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-57531566618492564982014-10-12T03:33:02.847+02:002014-10-12T03:33:02.847+02:00It may be a simple solution in your mind, but your...It may be a simple solution in your mind, but your the one that shows gross stupidity to even think that you could rid the world, much less the US, of all guns. Go get your big boy diapers on because I know you will piss yourself when you realize that it is not possible to ever reach your dreams of a gun free world. Not then, not now nor ever in the future. Ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com