tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post6123644630566947762..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Chronicling Mitt's MendacityAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-68627350931622264992012-04-23T09:41:10.107+02:002012-04-23T09:41:10.107+02:00Mud_rake, I see that you're another blogger wh...Mud_rake, I see that you're another blogger who's unwilling to open up articles for comment, but has no problem commenting on the sites of others. But consider a few points:<br /><br />1. IQ is a questionable measurement, as Stephen Jay Gould discussed in his book, "The Mismeasure of Man." (Citation, Democommie, citation!) It's a raw number that may or may not tell us anything about the abilities of the person measured. In addition, the act of measuring has a considerable risk of cultural bias skewing the results.<br /><br />2. That being said, how is it that you've determined the IQs of people commenting here? One's political or social philosophy is not causally linked to one's intelligence, despite what that nonsense study purported to say.<br /><br />3. "IQs" requires no apostrophe, since it's not possessive or a contraction.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-67592034963127647662012-04-23T06:30:11.275+02:002012-04-23T06:30:11.275+02:00I see no problem, keep your retarded little finger...I see no problem, keep your retarded little fingers away from the keyboard, idiot...Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-60026390965242639562012-04-23T00:20:08.777+02:002012-04-23T00:20:08.777+02:00I see that Mike is still plagued by comments from ...I see that Mike is still plagued by comments from folks with double-digit IQ's.mud_rakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786611698569598023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-89097274212022801392012-04-22T18:03:55.457+02:002012-04-22T18:03:55.457+02:00"If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you&..."If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot." <br />orlin sellersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-42172154241764828642012-04-22T13:40:00.426+02:002012-04-22T13:40:00.426+02:00Romney stands an excellent chance. Solid Republic...Romney stands an excellent chance. Solid Republicans and solid Democrats don't change their minds, so that group can be ignored. The twenty percent of undecided or swing voters is the target here, and the economy is weak. Obama looks weaker. This election will be a lot like 2004, down to a few key states like Florida and Ohio.<br /><br />But I have two questions for Maddow:<br /><br />1. Why did you have problems with the grammar of the sentence?<br /><br />2. Have you heard of Bill Clinton?Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com