tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post7151066752039206755..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Laci on the Supreme CourtAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-37119659396776340392010-09-06T13:25:20.570+02:002010-09-06T13:25:20.570+02:00Idunno Mike.
Laci's owner accuses me of not r...Idunno Mike.<br /><br />Laci's owner accuses me of not reading the subject of this post, and yet only one paragraph mentions a supposed bias.<br /><br />That's the only paragraph you could make heads or tails of, is it not?<br /><br />What does he mean by the right to bear arms being a civic right, and yet the people have no right to own them? No right to use them? (Except in Kennesaw, of course, but I fail to see how this prevents free speech or exercise of religion.)<br /><br />Do you think Laci's owner shows bias by calling for a strict reading and an amendment of the constitution to allow for self-defense, and yet in the same sentence claim that the Supreme Court is not allowed to interpret constitutionality of law with which that very Constitution grants it? How does he feel about "right to privacy"? "Separation of church and state"? "Confidential abortions for minors?" Should those just go away like this supposed non-codified right to "self defense"?<br /><br />Is Laci's owner just not personally biased against the other quoted phrases?<br /><br />What the hell does "judicial amendment" as used in his post mean? Is this the same amendment that was made with Heller which he says is not allowed? Does he really mean judicial interpretation or is he confusing that with the congressional amendment process?Van Dykehttp://www.bitrebels.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/goatee.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-849881073274167862010-09-06T12:31:54.703+02:002010-09-06T12:31:54.703+02:00I usually hate comparisons and find them wanting. ...I usually hate comparisons and find them wanting. Yours about the family court judge who has kids is one of the worst.<br /><br />I don't think the complaint is that Scalia is a simple gun owner. His involvement in the gun right's debate goes much deeper than that does it not?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-50673324847367355562010-09-04T16:11:12.679+02:002010-09-04T16:11:12.679+02:00The claim that he should be excused because he own...The claim that he should be excused because he owned guns is absurd.<br /><br />It's like requiring family court judges sit out any case involving children if they themselves have children.<br /><br />Laci's owner's legal perception is so warped he doesn't even believe in presumption of innocence.Van Dykehttp://www.modernhumorist.com/mh/0108/beard/images/01vandyke.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-75181184218821629632010-09-04T08:47:44.791+02:002010-09-04T08:47:44.791+02:00Van Dyke, What are you talking about? Is Scalia b...Van Dyke, What are you talking about? Is Scalia biased towards the gun cause or not?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-79857572816826928702010-09-03T22:49:36.416+02:002010-09-03T22:49:36.416+02:00Wow--three posts in little over an hour.
I must h...Wow--three posts in little over an hour.<br /><br />I must have struck a nerve.<br /><br />Glad you liked the picture. I'll adopt a new picture every day. This one is in honor of the Discovery shooter who was a fan of the man pictured.Van Dykehttp://www.modernhumorist.com/mh/0108/beard/images/01vandyke.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-72838245913347965342010-09-03T17:55:54.884+02:002010-09-03T17:55:54.884+02:00"One must decide the law based upon the law, ..."One must decide the law based upon the law, not one’s personal biases."<br /><br />In what fantasy world do they do this?AztecRedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00027951757285806109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-84560552962077814202010-09-03T14:18:27.315+02:002010-09-03T14:18:27.315+02:00And FWM once again proves that he doesn't real...And FWM once again proves that he doesn't really care about the law anyway.<br /><br />And also didn't read the original post.<br /><br />BTW, to answer the question, Maybe Scalia wrote the Heller decision as a distraction. That is the gunloons believe he is on their camp: so whatever he says must be "correct".<br /><br />Sort of like the way that "all the justices have concluded that the Second Amendment protects an individual right".<br /><br />Of course, people such as Van Dyke and FWM can't really be bothered with thinking about things.<br /><br />LaciLaci the Chinese Crestedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07371541369012938298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-30714917945230182022010-09-03T13:55:53.961+02:002010-09-03T13:55:53.961+02:00If only the Supreme Court were made up of superlaw...If only the Supreme Court were made up of superlawyers then Laci wouldn't have to spend so much time beating his dead horse.FatWhiteManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08946272184958991397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-63248590285770726922010-09-03T13:16:45.893+02:002010-09-03T13:16:45.893+02:00Oh, and it's pretty obvious that Van Dyke didn...Oh, and it's pretty obvious that Van Dyke didn't botherr reading the post.<br /><br />LaciLaci the Chinese Crestedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07371541369012938298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-33636893309403160782010-09-03T13:14:02.551+02:002010-09-03T13:14:02.551+02:001 Picture is worth a 1000 words.
Laci1 Picture is worth a 1000 words.<br /><br />LaciLaci the Chinese Crestedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07371541369012938298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-58120948457842241122010-09-03T08:15:08.377+02:002010-09-03T08:15:08.377+02:00Laci's owner tends to project many personal bi...Laci's owner tends to project many personal biases, so I doubt this person is qualified to identify biases in a federal judge.Van Dykehttp://vandykefan.tripod.com/celebrity/steve.jpgnoreply@blogger.com