tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post7390502026434806695..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Classic CommentAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-45893981660003174752014-04-26T18:15:21.029+02:002014-04-26T18:15:21.029+02:00Yep. That's all they had to say in the Miller...Yep. That's all they had to say in the Miller case- that Miller didn't have a right to ANY gun because he wasn't in a militia. But that's not what they said, is it? Instead they were going on about the type of gun, which means he had a right to other types of guns.TShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04667036856347626234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-71417867391486473912014-04-25T20:35:03.316+02:002014-04-25T20:35:03.316+02:00Can you cite the wording from a majority opinion w...Can you cite the wording from a majority opinion where a gun owner was found to be in the wrong for possessing a weapon while not being a member of the militia?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-77951260114465373292014-04-25T18:46:25.283+02:002014-04-25T18:46:25.283+02:00Still haven't read the cases from that pre-Hel...Still haven't read the cases from that pre-Heller period, eh Anonymous? Otherwise you'd know that the courts didn't interpret the amendment the way you keep claiming that they did.Simon J.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-27816438314644072862014-04-25T18:35:46.748+02:002014-04-25T18:35:46.748+02:00Simon asked you to provide support for your claim,...Simon asked you to provide support for your claim, but you haven't done so. By all means, show us this long history of interpreting the Second Amendment one way.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-86088570339903840142014-04-25T18:34:10.306+02:002014-04-25T18:34:10.306+02:00Sitting by yourself alone in a room must be a tryi...Sitting by yourself alone in a room must be a trying experience for you, then.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-37424080781745755392014-04-25T16:56:31.251+02:002014-04-25T16:56:31.251+02:00Over 250 years of interpreting it the other way do...Over 250 years of interpreting it the other way doesn't give confidence that this conservative slanted court got it right, and certainly has a much better chance of being overturned by a future court. Their current ruling doesn't even fit a typical precedent setting acceptability. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-37263419063825228832014-04-25T15:34:22.290+02:002014-04-25T15:34:22.290+02:00"which is one that is without a historic or l..."which is one that is without a historic or legal basis." - So can you say whether current interpretation of the 2nd Amendment grants an individual the right to own a gun regardless of their status as a member of the militia? It seems like something was recently decided by the Supreme Court that specifically addresses this for the first time ever, but maybe you can clear it up for us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-71550913066834380402014-04-25T14:37:33.266+02:002014-04-25T14:37:33.266+02:00Lets not forget that the Jim Crow laws were passed...Lets not forget that the Jim Crow laws were passed and upheld by the southern Democrats. In fact, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed with a larger percentage of Republicans voting in favor than Democrats.<br /><br />"The Senate version:<br />Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)<br />Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)<br /><br />The Senate version, voted on by the House:<br />Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)<br />Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)"<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#By_party<br /><br /><br />ssgmarkcrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14480230040370709682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-87270671531705200952014-04-25T14:30:31.832+02:002014-04-25T14:30:31.832+02:00The problem is that Greg has made it clear that he...The problem is that Greg has made it clear that he is fact adverse. He has made it clear that his opinion of the Second Amendment is the way "he wants it to be", which is one that is without a historic or legal basis.<br /><br />I don't think its worth my time dealing with someone who is not only ignorant, but willfully ignorant to boot.Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-19908384503509575632014-04-25T08:14:03.772+02:002014-04-25T08:14:03.772+02:00Goldilocks and his three comments return. If he c...Goldilocks and his three comments return. If he couldn't talk about race, sex, and a spice, he'd have nothing to say. Not that what he does say is of any value.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-18742707859221896072014-04-25T01:22:41.228+02:002014-04-25T01:22:41.228+02:00Jadegold, are you aware that the first gun and wea...Jadegold, are you aware that the first gun and weapon control laws were aimed specifically at denying freed blacks the ability to keep and bear arms? are you aware that the black codes stated that a black person couldn't own a dog because that dog could be used as a weapon? Are you aware that King actually attempted to get a weapons permit and was denied? The sad fact is people like you, and most of those who are gun control advocates are historically against rights.<br />MikeZAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com