tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post8807285565650765612..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Shameful ShitAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-34908388652724842032011-11-03T12:46:45.297+01:002011-11-03T12:46:45.297+01:00Tommy Trolltone:
You're not foolin' anybo...Tommy Trolltone:<br /><br />You're not foolin' anybody, son. I know you're trying to appear reasonable and reasonably intelligent--it's not working. Whereas the Egyptians, Syrians, Russians, U.S. and other countries might be doing this that or the other to their own citizens--Israel is, in point of fact, doing some fairly nasty shit to people who are NOT Israelis and who don't LIVE in Israel. And, perhaps you've missed it but the U.N. has been involved in getting in between groups of people bent on killing each other since at least 1950.<br /><br />I know you really, deep down, hate the U.N. and I'm pretty sure it's because your daddy and your grand-daddy hated the U.N. That's your privilege, we live in a free country. Please don't waste your time or ours trying to dress up your hatred of the U.N. with some sort of reichwing babble about the organization being a clique with the sole purpose of punishing Israel--it's bullshit and we all know it.democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-2301892446431201562011-11-03T03:04:16.468+01:002011-11-03T03:04:16.468+01:00The Egyptian military? How about Nicaragua, Costa ...<b>The Egyptian military? How about Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and on and on. You were all over the Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush deuce on this stuff, Right? See, I got a problem with all of you morons that only saw a problem with U.S. foreign policy in the years when the Rethublicans were out of power. But revisionist history IS the GOPricks' strong suit, donchaknow?</b><br /><br />Has the smell of Perperation H and Dentu-Cream made you mentally defective, I am talking about the treatment of people within their own borders...... <a rel="nofollow">the Egyptian government is murdering their own people....</a><br /><br />You effing-smelly-hippies are all over the Israelis, like stink on patchouli, yet not a peep out of the <a rel="nofollow">U</a>seless <a rel="nofollow">N</a>innies about human rights violations, when it is an Islamic nation doing the oppression.<br /><br />So, UNESCO can go piss up a rope kick the "Palistinians" (because they are not a nation) out or pay for it their-effing-selves.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-618118255485649782011-11-03T01:48:12.619+01:002011-11-03T01:48:12.619+01:00"The whole point is that we agree to support ...<i>"The whole point is that we agree to support the outcome of votes, whether we win or lose on what we want.<br /><br />That is the essential agreement in the social contract of representative government. It is the strongest and one of the most important parts of it.<br /><br />C'mon, you know that!"</i><br /><br />No, there is no social contract. There is no democracy or representative government here. We are talking about the UN which exists at our pleasure and purse.FatWhiteManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08946272184958991397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-14170523399859162112011-11-03T01:03:37.782+01:002011-11-03T01:03:37.782+01:00Oh, Tommy:
The egyptian military? How about Nica...Oh, Tommy:<br /><br />The egyptian military? How about Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and on and on. You were all over the Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush deuce on this stuff, Right? See, I got a problem with all of you morons that only saw a problem with U.S. foreign policy in the years when the Rethublicans were out of power. But revisionist history IS the GOPricks' strong suit, donchaknow?democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-15042237921972518892011-11-02T23:19:28.415+01:002011-11-02T23:19:28.415+01:00The most famous example being the cola drinks, in ...<b>The most famous example being the cola drinks, in particular Coca-Cola, containing cocaine.</b><br /><br />Right an ingredient that was for all purposes removed 3 years prior to establishment the FDA....Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-72602506530274332022011-11-02T23:13:53.557+01:002011-11-02T23:13:53.557+01:00SO, what does the consumer do when they have been ...<b>SO, what does the consumer do when they have been sold a toxic product in your world? Die?</b><br /><br />Well you don't look to the US Govt to try and remedy the situation.....<br /><br />http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6314891743204395487&postID=1465349462704650674<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/02/chinesemade-drywall-destr_n_523748.htmlThomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-33972232706919919402011-11-02T22:54:23.166+01:002011-11-02T22:54:23.166+01:00pooch said, "SO, what does the consumer do wh...pooch said, "SO, what does the consumer do when they have been sold a toxic product in your world? Die?<br /><br />You mean like a drug that's approved by the FDA that is unsafe and toxic. Yeah, you die. Most businesses aren't interested in killing off their customers, you know repeat business, word of mouth advertising and such.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-17495590761032025062011-11-02T22:51:26.602+01:002011-11-02T22:51:26.602+01:00I already knew you were an idiot but statements li...<b>I already knew you were an idiot but statements like that one will convince anyone who has a functional brain that you're a neocon stooge. Are you also one of the fundamentalist KKKristian shitheads that wants to see Israel secure in its homeland, just in time for Armageddon (the fabulistic notions of the idiots who wrote "The Book of Revelations" are beyond paranoid)?</b><br /><br />Hows about we see some resolutions regarding....The Egyptian Military's Crimes Against Humanity<br /><br />http://www.raymondibrahim.com/10498/the-egyptian-military-crimes-against-humanity<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/user/thecopticmartyrs?gl=US&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2Fthecopticmartyrs%3Fgl%3DUS#p/u/28/IXYgzHRYRxQ&has_verified=1<br /><br />http://bikyamasr.com/45280/egypt-state-television-admits-to-making-up-news-over-soldiers-deaths/<br /><br /><br />DoC, how about we allow Palestine UN representation right after China does the same for Taiwan.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-27058951700319437952011-11-02T22:15:28.733+01:002011-11-02T22:15:28.733+01:00Anonymous, explain this statement in the light of ...Anonymous, explain this statement in the light of pre-regulation product alteration:<br /><br /><i>Well, any real capitalist knows the answer to that - the market, their customers.</i><br /><br />For example,in the US pre-Pure Food and Drug Act any drugs had been sold as patent medicines with secret ingredients or misleading labels. Cocaine, heroin, cannabis, and so on. The most famous example being the cola drinks, in particular Coca-Cola, containing cocaine.<br /><br />There were other acts of adulteration as well, such as watering down milk, use of sawdust in bread, and so on for the less noxious cases. Other materials could be plain out toxic, caustic, and otherwise dangerous.<br /><br />SO, what does the consumer do when they have been sold a toxic product in your world? Die?<br /><br />You have already closed off the court system to "frivolous lawsuits", which these fall under.<br /><br />Your comment is plain out ignorant of reality.Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-4596508584119052202011-11-02T21:59:21.965+01:002011-11-02T21:59:21.965+01:00DAG:
You're upset? Obviously. I see that yo...DAG:<br /><br />You're upset? Obviously. I see that you're far too upset to offer any rebuttal beyond "You're a meanie.".<br /><br />Rebut my comments, if you can.democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-23499746973037546852011-11-02T21:56:53.430+01:002011-11-02T21:56:53.430+01:00"No, I think that they could be a again be a ..."No, I think that they could be a again be a really useful organization.... When they stop being a resolution mill for the we hate Israel coalition....<br /><br />November 2, 2011 7:12 PM"<br /><br />I already knew you were an idiot but statements like that one will convince anyone who has a functional brain that you're a neocon stooge. Are you also one of the fundamentalist KKKristian shitheads that wants to see Israel secure in its homeland, just in time for Armageddon (the fabulistic notions of the idiots who wrote "The Book of Revelations" are beyond paranoid)?democommiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08714733977927594559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-25104007483920800102011-11-02T21:22:35.255+01:002011-11-02T21:22:35.255+01:00We voluntarily commit the funds above because it s...<b><a rel="nofollow">We voluntarily commit the funds above because it serves our own interests to do so.</a> Some of the funding for UNICEF comes from our membership, and represents an obligation rather than a voluntary contribution.</b><br /><br />Does it not serve the interests of, Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chad, Chile, China, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Honduras, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zimbabwe....<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow">Why is it only in the intrests of the USA none of these other countries?</a><br /><br /><b>We are not responsible, nor do we have the authority over any other country's contribution or membership obligation.</b><br /><br />Somebody does, somebody presents the bill.....how else do we know how much we should "voluntarily" contribute?Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-24817901836259782012011-11-02T20:20:12.562+01:002011-11-02T20:20:12.562+01:00Anonymous amusingly sez:
Well us damn Americans do...Anonymous amusingly sez:<br /><i>Well us damn Americans don't much care for legalities.</i><br /><br />Then goes forth to contradict himself.<br /><br />The problem is that the Rebellious colonists knew full well that what they had done was illegal. Benjamin Franklin made the point more tellingly when, as he was about to sign the Declaration, he remarked, “We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall hang separately.” <br /><br />The fifty-six men signed the Declaration of Independence were all fully aware that the punishment for treason was death by hanging or dismemberment. Five Southern delegates were captured by the British, arrested as traitors and brutally tortured. Twelve had their homes ransacked, looted, burned and other property destroyed. <br /><br />One signer, Thomas McKean, observed in an early case that came before him as a judge post-independence, “In civil wars, every man chooses his party; but generally that side which prevails arrogates the right of treating those who are vanquished as rebels.”<br /><br />As I said, one of the Purposes of the Declaration of Independence was to give an air of legitimacy to the Independence movement.<br /><br />But,even in their dislike of British Rule, the North American Colonists knew that government and law was necessary. Without some form of government, the rebels would have been unable to have functioned. The Articles gave legitimacy to the Continental Congress to direct the American Revolutionary War and conduct diplomacy with Europe.<br /><br />So,without government, I seriously doubt the US would exist. If the early colonists had truly been libertarians, the rebels would have been hanged (or worse) and the colonies would have remained British since there would have been no unifying force that would have given legitimacy to the rebels.<br /><br />Franklin said:<br /><a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/franklin.html" rel="nofollow"><i>I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.</i></a><br /><br />Now, try to wrap your tiny brain around that one, anonymous!Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-51694694065181164352011-11-02T20:15:01.761+01:002011-11-02T20:15:01.761+01:00Who will regulate business? Well, any real capital...Who will regulate business? Well, any real capitalist knows the answer to that - the market, their customers. <br />But, when you have corporatism/fascism that isn't so possible when government keeps propping up cheaters it is in be with.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-83623035527422549172011-11-02T20:05:37.901+01:002011-11-02T20:05:37.901+01:00I wrote:
"Voluntary contributions are, as the...I wrote:<br />"Voluntary contributions are, as the name implies, voluntary rather than assessed payments left to the discretion of each individual Member State."<br /><br />Anonymous wrote:<br /><br /><i>Then divide up the 60 million equally among the 107 yes voting member states and let them "volunteer" to pay it. they are in a "social contract", right? Be sure to get Canada on board.....</i><br /><br /><br />From my previous comment:<br /><br />"These UN agencies undertake activities critical to U.S. national security interests that would be difficult, if not impossible, for the U.S. to undertake alone. U.S. voluntary contributions are financed through the State Department’s International Organizations and Programs account."<br /><br />We voluntarily commit the funds above because it serves our own interests to do so. Some of the funding for UNICEF comes from our membership, and represents an obligation rather than a voluntary contribution.<br /><br />We are not responsible, nor do we have the authority over any other country's contribution or membership obligation.<br /><br />That would include Canada. So, no, I don't have to get Canada on board or do anything else other than correct your ignorance.dog gonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151618317070878675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-49217735988726015932011-11-02T20:03:33.862+01:002011-11-02T20:03:33.862+01:00Being a capitalist business person I really don...<i>Being a capitalist business person I really don't think I hate capitalism. But what I really do hate is morons confusing the corporatism/fascism we have today being called capitalism.</i><br /><br />Then why do you dislike bankers, who are "the circulatory system of the capitalist body?"<br /><br />And that's an even more amusing comment given that you think that government should deregulate business.<br /><br />Who will regulate business then, business?<br /><br />If anything you are the confused moron, anonymous.<br /><br />You have made it abundantly clear you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about on pretty much every topic you have discussed here.Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-25608020574706394622011-11-02T20:00:43.873+01:002011-11-02T20:00:43.873+01:00Well us damn Americans don't much care for leg...Well us damn Americans don't much care for legalities. We went wrote us up Article of Conferderation and the Perpetual Union, went and had it ratified by the 13 STATES, we even had the audacity not to call 'em colonies, went and created us a Continental Congress and a Continental Army. <br />And when that treaty came up most of the representatives were home and didn't attend Congressional sessions cuz they were at home mindin' their business. <br />But even with that old Articles of Confederation they carried on diplomacy with Europe even though I guess it wasn't legal, they didn't have a permit from Britain. No other countries much seemed to care, about permits though.<br />Now had you been there, we would have had to get a permit to start a country, build an army and start a war. If you people would have been in charge we'd still be waiting fer our permits and the regulations that went with 'em. <br />Yup, we weren't no stinkin country till George said so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-86213655565640347292011-11-02T20:00:08.282+01:002011-11-02T20:00:08.282+01:00Anonymous demonstrates he does not understand eith...Anonymous demonstrates he does not understand either English or history when he says:<br /><i>Oh, so the French were aiding the British. Yup, that makes sense.</i><br /><br />That comment is clarified further down in the comment that Anonymous fails to comprehend:<br /><br /><i>It is a well accepted fact that the British would have eventually defeated the <b>US</b> without <b>its</b> having had foreign Aid (in particular French) during the War for Independence. The combined strength of the Americans and the French virtually guaranteed victory against Great Britain.</i><br /><br /><b>Its</b> would refer to the <b>US</b>.<br /><br />Your failure to understand that the US was a British Colony until the Treaty of Paris was signed and gave the US international recognition as an independent nation.Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-48698293839938777392011-11-02T19:59:06.632+01:002011-11-02T19:59:06.632+01:00Anonymous said...
Let's see, which docume...Anonymous said...<br /><br /> <i>Let's see, which document allowed slavery in the US? Oh, the Constitution. Which flag was that under? Oh, the Stars & Stripes. Please don't try to play some morality card over the issue.<br /> And since it was in the Constitution, you legal nuts should be happier than hell."</i><br /><br />Ah,what a laugh watching you cherry pick history and then try to contort it into your own revisionist form.<br /><br />The colonies which became the first 13 states were not unanimous about slavery; those areas which were the Union during the Civil War had largely opposed it from before the writing of the U.S. Constitution, and opposed slavery being included in that document.<br /><br />They were stuck with the whole issue because slavery had been legal under the British, who btw, got rid of it before we did, for the correct reasons. Slavery was immoral, and unethical, and the social contract was changed to correct and reflect that.<br /><br />Which does not change a word that I wrote about the moral high ground. The north and west recognized that blacks were fully and equally human being long before the Southerners who attempted insurrection did - and I'm sometimes not persuaded that those who are so pro-Civil War points of view have caught up even now. <br /><br /> "Being a capitalist business person I really don't think I hate capitalism. But what I really do hate is morons confusing the corporatism/fascism we have today being called capitalism."<br /><br />Stop being stupid Anonymous; corporations engage in capitalism; you don't get to define it as only small business is capitalism, big business something else, any more than I can fairly and objectively say a Yorkie or Chihuahua is not a dog, but a Great Dane is because of size.<br /><br />You just made another ignorant statement. Consider the message skewered to the blog wall, doused with an accelerant, set on fire, and peed on by the canine Laci when the ashes and embers fell on the ground afterwards.dog gonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151618317070878675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-5675198350787630212011-11-02T19:44:14.461+01:002011-11-02T19:44:14.461+01:00Anonymous wrote:
"Anonymous said...
in ...Anonymous wrote:<br /><br />"Anonymous said...<br /><br /> in regard to the so-called social contract, I have often had occasion to protest that I haven't even seen the contract, much less been asked to consent to it. A valid contract requires voluntary offer, acceptance, and consideration."<br /><br />Really? Do you vote? Then you agreed to join the contract in progress through representative government. Do you benefit from any if not all the provisions of this country - security, schools, roads, etc.? Then you agree to the social contract by accepting its benefits. <br /><br />"I've never received an offer from my rulers, so I certainly have not accepted one; and rather than consideration, I have received nothing but contempt from the rulers, who, notwithstanding the absence of any agreement, have indubitably threatened me with grave harm in the event that I fail to comply with their edicts."<br /><br />The social contract does not include sending you an engraved invitation. You decide to be a citizen - or not be a citizen, with the attendant duties and privileges of either choice. Take it or leave it, but please, spare us the whinging about it.<br /><br />Too bad, but you weren't one of the original drafters of this particular contract. You have the input of one man one vote to alter it, but you don't personally get to undo the consent of anyone else to those terms. It is,for better or for worse, the way one citizen, one vote works.dog gonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151618317070878675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-69618949225154300352011-11-02T19:36:11.022+01:002011-11-02T19:36:11.022+01:00No, the French were aiding a rebellion against the...No, the French were aiding a rebellion against the British, one which the British could fairly call treasonous.<br /><br />Or do you not understand the word Revolution in the phrase American Revolution.<br /><br />The British did not provide a mechanism for secession, unlike the new, replacement social contract which formed after the revolution. Therefore there was no parliamentary means to secede, no legal option. That was not the case in the U.S. Civil War.<br /><br />Full and legal separation did not occur until the treaty was signed, and England acknowledged that we were separate, and until that treaty was signed they could have reopened hostilities at any time. Had they done so, we would have lost, eventually,so that separation was not such a done deal as you suggest until the treaty was concluded.<br /><br />You don't have much exposure to concepts of diplomatic process do you?dog gonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151618317070878675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-22803477681656801582011-11-02T19:30:03.947+01:002011-11-02T19:30:03.947+01:00Somebody said: "Until it was signed, the Unit...Somebody said: "Until it was signed, the United Colonies were still British."<br /><br />Oh, so the French were aiding the British. Yup, that makes sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-60110329963884416472011-11-02T19:24:11.528+01:002011-11-02T19:24:11.528+01:00Let's see, which document allowed slavery in t...Let's see, which document allowed slavery in the US? Oh, the Constitution. Which flag was that under? Oh, the Stars & Stripes. Please don't try to play some morality card over the issue.<br />And since it was in the Constitution, you legal nuts should be happier than hell.<br /><br />Being a capitalist business person I really don't think I hate capitalism. But what I really do hate is morons confusing the corporatism/fascism we have today being called capitalism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-3234910127127203132011-11-02T19:13:41.896+01:002011-11-02T19:13:41.896+01:00Sorry to burst your blissful bubble of ignornance ...Sorry to burst your blissful bubble of ignornance (pop!), anonymous, but the US was not independent until the Treaty of Paris.<br /><br />The US came very close to defeat and probably would have been defeated had it not been for <a href="http://xenophongroup.com/mcjoynt/alliance.htm" rel="nofollow">the aid of the French (and Spanish and Dutch).</a><br /><br />The US had no industrial manufacturing base during this period and couldn't manufacture enough weapons to fight the British.<br /><br />It is a well accepted fact that the British would have eventually defeated the US without its having had foreign Aid (in particular French) during the War for Independence. The combined strength of the Americans and the French virtually guaranteed victory against Great Britain.<br /><br />So, your comment is totally without basis--The Treat of Paris is what brought the US international recognition and legitimacy.<br /><br />Until it was signed, the United Colonies were still British.Laci The Doghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07138644349857941157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-27621654051367363322011-11-02T19:12:35.740+01:002011-11-02T19:12:35.740+01:00Dog gone said,
Voluntary contributions are, as th...<b>Dog gone said,<br /><br />Voluntary contributions are, as the name implies, voluntary rather than assessed payments left to the discretion of each individual Member State.</b><br /><br />Then divide up the 60 million equally among the 107 yes voting member states and let them "volunteer" to pay it. they are in a "social contract", right? Be sure to get Canada on board.....<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/01/john-baird-unesco-funding_n_1070137.html<br /><br /><br /><br /><b>DoC said,<br /><br />I'm just gonna go out on a really stout, kevlar reinforced, carbon graphite limb here and say you think the U.N. should be disbanded.</b><br /><br />No, I think that they could be a again be a really useful organization.... When they stop being a resolution mill for the we hate Israel coalition....Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17279097946597602013noreply@blogger.com