tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post1969866198003222483..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Why Bob S. Won't Allow My Comments - As Told to ZorroAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-18576693799690188032010-11-10T09:22:55.424+01:002010-11-10T09:22:55.424+01:00RuffRidr, I honestly don't know what outing yo...RuffRidr, I honestly don't know what outing you're talking about. I assumed it was something Jadegold did, I apologize to him for that.<br /><br />In my opinion, I respect people's privacy. That's my opinion of myself. Take it or leave it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-14432678302943406422010-11-09T22:28:36.704+01:002010-11-09T22:28:36.704+01:00That's all fine and dandy JadeGold, but I wasn...That's all fine and dandy JadeGold, but I wasn't the one claiming to respect other people's rights to privacy. MikeB is. It is very clear that by allowing these types of things to be posted by anonymous cowards, that he indeed does NOT respect that right. If he would have came out and said he actually encourages such behavior by allowing it to happen, then you see that would be a truthful statement, and I would have no beef with him.RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-82922393142825297402010-11-09T21:54:19.721+01:002010-11-09T21:54:19.721+01:00Ruffy: I realize it may be tough for you to stop ...Ruffy: I realize it may be tough for you to stop singing the one note in your repertoire but you can't have it both ways.<br /><br />I don't see you at the usual gunloon blogs complaining that it's wrong to out me. To the contrary, you encourage it and try to embellish the many "crimes" you and yours purport I commit.<br /><br />I can't speak for Mikeb--and it's not my blog--but I've not outted anyone and I see no evidence Mikeb has either. OTOH, we do have a fairly liberal comment moderation policy hereabouts. We publish most any comment, even those that attack us or dissent from our views. No gunloon blog can say this.Jadegoldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09219212637582238275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-45807044686766522882010-11-09T21:37:42.993+01:002010-11-09T21:37:42.993+01:00I have a simple question: why does Mike or Jadegol...<i>I have a simple question: why does Mike or Jadegold have an obligation to protect Weer'd's anonymity? </i><br /><br />Simple answer: he doesn't. But then you can't turn around and claim you do respect their right to keep that info private. It's obvious MikeB doesn't respect that right. So why claim you do? It just makes you look like a lying fool.RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-9298971345737765882010-11-09T21:32:41.091+01:002010-11-09T21:32:41.091+01:00RSS: It's quite simple.
It's ok to expos...RSS: It's quite simple.<br /><br />It's ok to expose those who don't hew to the NRA partyline and to post their addresses and such.<br /><br />OTOH, it's *wrong* to out gunloons.Jadegoldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09219212637582238275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-46638211968190722112010-11-09T19:59:35.516+01:002010-11-09T19:59:35.516+01:00I have a simple question: why does Mike or Jadeg...I have a simple question: why does Mike or Jadegold have an obligation to protect Weer'd's anonymity? <br /><br />Just because he wants them to?R. Stanton Scotthttp://www.foggybottomline.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-59977120102504611362010-11-09T18:19:07.099+01:002010-11-09T18:19:07.099+01:00Aren't the restrictions on your commenting com...Aren't the restrictions on your commenting common sense? Reasonable restriction? <br /><br />Maybe you are one of the 10% of his commenters that shouldn't be commenting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-45508209284447628982010-11-09T17:11:15.569+01:002010-11-09T17:11:15.569+01:00Besides, we were talking about Bob's justifica...<i>Besides, we were talking about Bob's justification for not allowing my comments. You support that, no doubt. You think it's normal that he insists that I "exercise my 1st Amendment right" about my personal life of 30 years ago and only then will he post my comments?</i><br /><br />Think of it this way MikeB, it is not a "ban" on you posting there. You are perfectly able to do that. You just have to do it in the narrow parameters that someone else has felt is justified. Isn't irony delicious?RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-25978457745147801182010-11-09T17:08:14.632+01:002010-11-09T17:08:14.632+01:00Does my allowing my co-blogger to do what he wants...<i>Does my allowing my co-blogger to do what he wants disprove that. I don't think so.</i><br /><br />It wasn't JadeGold who did the outing. We all know who it was, but I'll just refer to him as anonymous coward. Anyway, this is your blog, not theirs. YOU are the one responsible for personal details posted on this site. You are perfectly able to delete comments and posts that seek to reveal and exploit personal information. Failing to do so supports them by proxy. So therefore you can claim to respect people's right to keep information private, but we all know that that is total bullshit. You don't respect your commentors at all.<br /><br />Just curious, what would your reaction if Weer'd, Bob S., or someone else posted all of your personal details on one of their blogs? Maybe we should all give you the same respect you've shown us.RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-27800848924731357642010-11-09T16:00:23.452+01:002010-11-09T16:00:23.452+01:00Was there a question? I didn't think your obse...Was there a question? I didn't think your observation needed a response, even if it were in the form of a question.<br /><br />Bob S. is crying incessantly about my not talking about what I did or did not do 30 years ago. Jadegold outed Weer'd, is that what you're referring to? I don't even remember it or give a shit. My question to you is what does one have to do with the other.<br /><br />I said that <i>I respect people's right to keep what they want private.</i> Does my allowing my co-blogger to do what he wants disprove that. I don't think so. We've also had many comments which say things I wouldn't say myself, do I need to clean all them up in order to make that statement about MYSELF. I don't think so.<br /><br />Besides, we were talking about Bob's justification for not allowing my comments. You support that, no doubt. You think it's normal that he insists that I "exercise my 1st Amendment right" about my personal life of 30 years ago and only then will he post my comments?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-68285132117053031562010-11-09T14:37:34.834+01:002010-11-09T14:37:34.834+01:00No reply? I guess you don't have the respect ...No reply? I guess you don't have the respect for people's wishes after all.RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-21543817017160904982010-11-08T15:08:16.225+01:002010-11-08T15:08:16.225+01:00Especially when it comes to personal details, I re...<i>Especially when it comes to personal details, I respect people's right to keep what they want private.</i><br /><br />Riiiiiiiight. That's why Weer'd Beard's name was outed in a cowardly fashion on your blog and it still remains there today.RuffRidrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597758856457029471noreply@blogger.com