tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post5692144857760806292..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Repeal the 2nd AmendmentAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-33902016291978315552012-08-14T16:12:55.453+02:002012-08-14T16:12:55.453+02:00So you won't object if the U.S. Army quarters ...So you won't object if the U.S. Army quarters soldiers in your home in peacetime? Send your address to the Pentagon.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-38819639197121997512012-08-14T12:33:59.635+02:002012-08-14T12:33:59.635+02:00Are you people talking about Trayvon Martin? At le...Are you people talking about Trayvon Martin? At least get his name right when pretending to care about him. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-80929066956622077952012-08-14T10:43:49.996+02:002012-08-14T10:43:49.996+02:00Rights are not rights, Greg. That's total bul...Rights are not rights, Greg. That's total bullshit that someone made up and you thought sounded good so you keep saying it.<br /><br />The 3A is not the kind of "right" that freedom of worship is. The 2A likewise is irrelevant.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-9230024663815807002012-08-14T03:09:07.859+02:002012-08-14T03:09:07.859+02:00Seriously. Who is Trayvon Williams? Seriously. Who is Trayvon Williams? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-77297856018421708592012-08-13T23:17:14.531+02:002012-08-13T23:17:14.531+02:00Who is John Galt?Who is John Galt?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-83638162254664576722012-08-13T21:30:06.691+02:002012-08-13T21:30:06.691+02:00Well first of all we cannot quantify the benefit o...Well first of all we cannot quantify the benefit of how many crimes and invasions didn't happen because citizens were armed. Even more important, we cannot quantify the benefit of how many future crimes and invasions won't happen because citizens will be armed.<br /><br />More importantly, all of the amendments are about limiting government's role in people's lives -- basically keeping government subservient to "We the People". "We the People" cannot be superior to government if there is not a robust, almost unlimited application of the Second Amendment ... just as there needs to be a robust, almost unlimited application of the First Amendment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-20415302740996164362012-08-13T15:34:54.391+02:002012-08-13T15:34:54.391+02:00You mean the way that you attack gun owners? Go b...You mean the way that you attack gun owners? Go back and look at the articles written here about Zimmerman. You decided that he was guilty. You reached that decision because you were told that he's white and Martin was black. The facts that have come out since the shooting don't make Zimmerman look perfect--that's the standard that you demand from us--but it looks clear that he acted in self-defense that night.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-30872091879157285662012-08-13T15:22:18.498+02:002012-08-13T15:22:18.498+02:00Because rights are rights, Mikeb. The arguments t...Because rights are rights, Mikeb. The arguments that apply to the Second Amendment apply just as well or as poorly to the First. If he or you seriously believe that our rights are stuck in the eighteenth century, feel free to join the Amish. I'll respect that. They've made an honest choice.Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-2199983765864137192012-08-13T14:03:05.414+02:002012-08-13T14:03:05.414+02:00Because he is using his 1A rights to spew bullshit...Because he is using his 1A rights to spew bullshit.FatWhiteManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08946272184958991397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-55159089503730931402012-08-13T12:11:22.074+02:002012-08-13T12:11:22.074+02:00Who is Trayvon Williams?Who is Trayvon Williams?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-35678000283159857612012-08-13T09:52:40.542+02:002012-08-13T09:52:40.542+02:00Greg, you know that's not what he meant. What...Greg, you know that's not what he meant. What you do though is very telling. You support the gun owner in a blind-loyalty kinda way. That proves your bias and close-mindedness and does nothing to convince others that you're right.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-86583188730102977992012-08-13T09:50:40.220+02:002012-08-13T09:50:40.220+02:00Why do you have to refer to the 1A?Why do you have to refer to the 1A?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-67055672580627145872012-08-13T00:32:12.039+02:002012-08-13T00:32:12.039+02:00It shore is funny how thugs end up dead when they ...It shore is funny how thugs end up dead when they attack armed citizens--is that what you meant, Professor?Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-35272906453036809592012-08-13T00:03:52.570+02:002012-08-13T00:03:52.570+02:00Agreed, Trayvon Williams isn't better off for ...Agreed, Trayvon Williams isn't better off for George Zimmermans 2nd amendment rights.Professornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-53755590164948107112012-08-12T17:27:51.144+02:002012-08-12T17:27:51.144+02:00I think that this fellow must be lonely in Utah. ...I think that this fellow must be lonely in Utah. That being said, he has the right to his opinion, no matter how crazy. Perhaps he should read about the process for amending the Constitution. Does he really believe that repealing the Second Amendment could happen?Greg Camphttp://gregorycamp.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-87399110660169540622012-08-12T13:20:26.336+02:002012-08-12T13:20:26.336+02:00"What do you think?"
I think the guy is...<i>"What do you think?"</i><br /><br />I think the guy is a moron. I wonder if he only believes that the 1st amendment applies to just print. I mean, radio, TV and the internet didn't exist in 1776 which seems to be his benchmark.FatWhiteManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08946272184958991397noreply@blogger.com