tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post8408904288573957375..comments2024-02-05T03:41:13.688+01:00Comments on Mikeb302000: Efraim Diveroli Boy GeniusAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-29093936017142685822009-01-28T15:22:00.000+01:002009-01-28T15:22:00.000+01:00My point again, Proven, Muddy! Troll on! It's...My point again, Proven, Muddy! Troll on! It's fun for me too!Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-44634566616116804722009-01-28T14:32:00.000+01:002009-01-28T14:32:00.000+01:00Therefore, one might conclude, that Weerd exemplif...Therefore, one might conclude, that Weerd exemplifies the model visitor to this blog. Apparently he knows best what are and what are not appropriate comments. <BR/><BR/> That is always good to know. We need to follow the higher standards of others so that we, those of us who are neophytes in this blogging endeavor, know what is and what is not 'appropriate.'<BR/><BR/>I will look more closely, from now on, at Weerd's comments so that I can raise myself up to his standards, his level of debate, his intellectual and maturity level.<BR/><BR/>Hats off to you, Weerd, for helping me become a much better blog visitor.mud_rakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786611698569598023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-6165002097383846312009-01-28T10:52:00.000+01:002009-01-28T10:52:00.000+01:00Mud_Rake's first appearance here was as a troll fo...Mud_Rake's first appearance here was as a troll following Barb. He has shown him self to be nothing but a troll here.<BR/><BR/>I'm simply calling him out to prove me wrong by actually adding to the discussion. He's so far shown he's incapable of doing so, so my accusation (for the time being) has been proven correct.<BR/><BR/>I in no way think he has no right to post here (or on my own blog which has an identical posting policy) but I'm just exercising my right to observe that he is nothing but a troll here.<BR/><BR/>As for Barb, I hold no loyalty to her, nor do I consider myself as somebody who agrees with her (frankly I don't know if a disagree with Muddy, as he has presented nothing but rude behavior her, so honestly I can't tell you the finer points of his socio-political views)<BR/>And in particular I disagree with her stance on the church, homosexuals, and her blanket view of Muslims...and frankly I find myself only skimming her longer posts.<BR/><BR/>I don't take kindly to your assertion that somehow my declaration of him being a troll has to do with a political difference...as with the exception of Bob S and maybe Sevesteen (who I can't comment as firmly on because of the amount of posts I've read from him...I should be reading his blog more), who he and I see eye-to-eye on the issues on an eerie level, I disagree on MANY issues with the majority of your commenters.<BR/><BR/>Thomas has also exhibited rude behavior here (and at my blog) but I have reserved labeling him a troll because he always seems to have a point to get across...just maybe not the greatest methods to communicate that. I'm glad he has his own blog now, it should be a great outlet for him, and so far a great place to read stories and his unique commentary.Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-11746129059775792982009-01-28T10:25:00.000+01:002009-01-28T10:25:00.000+01:00Weer'd, Please remember that Mud_Rake is my guest ...Weer'd, Please remember that Mud_Rake is my guest here just like you are, and as such he's entitled to say whatever he likes, just like you. Remember my "commenting policy?" <BR/><BR/>I'm curious about your attitude towards him, though. Does it stem for Mud's first appearance here when he was taunting Barb? Initially, as I remember, you seemed protective of her. But, right after that she went on those unbelievable rants about things I know you don't agree with. So, what gives? Are you still after Mud_Rake because of Barb?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09806175370305006933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-43861012351689267252009-01-28T03:04:00.000+01:002009-01-28T03:04:00.000+01:00He just doesn't get it.Color me "unsurprised"I loo...He just doesn't get it.<BR/><BR/>Color me "unsurprised"<BR/><BR/>I look forward to future trolling from you, Muddy. I'm sure it's the best you can possibly do!Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-67879422864976184092009-01-28T02:41:00.000+01:002009-01-28T02:41:00.000+01:00In other words, I should "Go to Hell!"In other words, I should "Go to Hell!"mud_rakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786611698569598023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-50342732455645278152009-01-28T00:00:00.000+01:002009-01-28T00:00:00.000+01:00Nope,just my way of dealing with trolls who have n...Nope,just my way of dealing with trolls who have no interest in debate.<BR/><BR/>Of course you can prove me wrong by your own actions.<BR/><BR/>Good luck in spiting me that way! : ]Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-11326328015764514112009-01-27T22:49:00.000+01:002009-01-27T22:49:00.000+01:00Weerd- I notice that twice you have called me a tr...Weerd- I notice that twice you have called me a troll. Is that your usual means of dealing with people to the left-of-center on the political spectrum rather than engaging them in real debate?mud_rakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786611698569598023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-26974722975589673842009-01-27T17:07:00.000+01:002009-01-27T17:07:00.000+01:00But at least let me offer a fair price on the ammo...But at least let me offer a fair price on the ammo first.Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-76442077022790050102009-01-27T16:46:00.000+01:002009-01-27T16:46:00.000+01:00he's a bad apple all right. he knowingly broke the...he's a bad apple all right. he knowingly broke the law when doing business with the government, as evidenced by his deliberately trying to cover up that fact, and was found out when the goods he sold to the government were found to be substandard. a classic war profiteer, except apparently not smart enough to avoid justice or know he was going to be found out.<BR/><BR/>the laws he violated may or may not be "bullshit", but he damn well knew he was violating them yet went ahead and did it anyway, for profit. lock 'im up and throw away the key.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-39220371662025882502009-01-27T16:25:00.000+01:002009-01-27T16:25:00.000+01:00Funny how government regulations are hooey, unless...Funny how government regulations are hooey, unless they are the ones requiring the tax payers to support the "less fortunate", eh Mud?Bob S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15882819735831651314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-59287960261274759392009-01-27T16:15:00.000+01:002009-01-27T16:15:00.000+01:00Awww was that an ad hominem, Trolly?You're so cuit...Awww was that an ad hominem, Trolly?<BR/><BR/>You're so cuite! : ]Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-2215264335600490832009-01-27T15:06:00.000+01:002009-01-27T15:06:00.000+01:00One doesn't have to be, as you say, an 'anti-gun h...One doesn't have to be, as you say, an 'anti-gun huff-po' to know that so-called government regulations and government 'over site' is hooey. That is the point of this post, WB, and one needs not be a 'gun-freak' to clearly see his point.mud_rakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786611698569598023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6314891743204395487.post-8062880176906215622009-01-27T12:07:00.000+01:002009-01-27T12:07:00.000+01:00The laws he violated were bullshit ones as far as ...The laws he violated were bullshit ones as far as I can tell from the linked articles.<BR/><BR/>Also neat how the anti-gun huff-po knows a thing or two about military munitions.<BR/><BR/>I have a case of Bulgarian heavy-ball 7.62X54R right here in my Armory, right beside it I have a few clips left of another case of Hungarian ammo. Dates on the heads: 1950 and 1951. They look brand new, and shoot as well as the day they were made.<BR/><BR/>How I feel about this guy will depend on the court case. From the article he was dealing only in pre-ban weapons and ammo, but it also mentions defacing crates to hide nation of origin.<BR/><BR/>No matter what it's violation of a law I don't agree with. If we want am embargo from china I'm fine with that (despite the fact that the company I work with has a branch in China and I'd likely loose my job if such an embargo would happen) but don't pick-and-choose what goods can be traded. This ammunition could be used to supply our military forces and allies, and given that it isn't a few banned bullet-makes it could supply hunters, shooters, and private citizens with affordable ammunition.Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.com