Monday, August 8, 2011

Shot in the Back Running Away

The Daily Times reports on the events which took place in Chester PA

Police said Simms, of the 500 block of Rose Street, was carrying a gun when he attempted to flee from officers during a pedestrian stop Friday night on East 23rd Street near Crosby Street. He was shot in the back by an officer at 7:53 p.m. and died in the CCMC emergency room at 8:10 p.m.

Police said “a weapon was recovered at the scene and submitted into evidence.”

Simms’ death is being investigated by the Delaware County Special Prosecutor’s Office. Anyone with information is asked to contact Detective Robert T Lythgoe Jr. at 610-891-4243 or Detective Thomas H. Worrilow at 610-891-4244.

I suppose everyone who reads this will be calling in to report the information that cops aren't supposed to be shooting fleeing suspects in the back. It doesn't matter if the runner is armed or not.

In order to get away with murder, what we're often told is the guy was going for his gun, while running away. Sometimes, he even turns a little and points the gun over his shoulder. But, really , it doesn't matter what bullshit story the cops come up with, they usually support each other in these cases and indeed get away with murder.

What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.


  1. Pow!!!, pow!!! kerpow!!!August 9, 2011 at 1:06 AM

    Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007)

    Says, the police can shoot them in the back, and are not responsible for thier injuries.....

    If the bitch had dropped the gun and laid down like he was supposed to, he would not have gotten his dumb ass capped, sucks to be him.

  2. Is that really what Scott vs. Harris said? I seriously doubt it. Would the cops go to so much trouble lying about guys reaching for a guns if they didn't have to?

  3. mike - I love how you just assume the cops are lying about criminal activities.

  4. Jim, You're right. I love to presume guilt on the part of the police who shoot unarmed people or armed ones who are running away.