Monday, September 19, 2011

The New American Revolution Began on the 17th September

17 September 2011 was the first day of "Occupy Wall Street" -- at least a thousand people were in the Wall Street district to protest. There are lots of tweets going on (#OCCUPYWALLSTREET and #takewallstreet). People are getting ready to sleep in the Wall Street district. The police were out in force, guarding all entrances to Wall Street, the famous bull statue, many banks in the area -- that was only the first day; could build over the next month. It is another sign of revolt building.

The website organising this event has the following statement:
We want freedom for all, without regards for identity, because we are all people, and because no other reason should be needed. However, this freedom has been largely taken from the people, and slowly made to trickle down, whenever we get angry.

Money, it has been said, has taken over politics. In truth, we say, money has always been part of the capitalist political system. A system based on the existence of have and have nots, where inequality is inherent to the system, will inevitably lead to a situation where the haves find a way to rule, whether by the sword or by the dollar.

We agree that we need to see election reform. However, the election reform proposed ignores the causes which allowed such a system to happen. Some will readily blame the federal reserve, but the political system has been beholden to political machinations of the wealthy well before its founding.

We need to address the core facts: these corporations, even if they were unable to compete in the electoral arena, would still remain control of society. They would retain economic control, which would allow them to retain political control. Term limits would, again, not solve this, as many in the political class already leave politics to find themselves as part of the corporate elites.

We need to retake the freedom that has been stolen from the people, altogether.

If you agree that freedom is the right to communicate, to live, to be, to go, to love, to do what you will without the impositions of others, then you might be one of us.

If you agree that a person is entitled to the sweat of their brows, that being talented at management should not entitle others to act like overseers and overlords, that all workers should have the right to engage in decisions, democratically, then you might be one of us.

If you agree that freedom for some is not the same as freedom for all, and that freedom for all is the only true freedom, then you might be one of us.

If you agree that power is not right, that life trumps property, then you might be one of us.

If you agree that state and corporation are merely two sides of the same oppressive power structure, if you realize how media distorts things to preserve it, how it pits the people against the people to remain in power, then you might be one of us.

And so we call on people to act

We call for protests to remain active in the cities. Those already there, to grow, to organize, to raise consciousnesses, for those cities where there are no protests, for protests to organize and disrupt the system.

We call for workers to not only strike, but seize their workplaces collectively, and to organize them democratically. We call for students and teachers to act together, to teach democracy, not merely the teachers to the students, but the students to the teachers. To seize the classrooms and free minds together.

We call for the unemployed to volunteer, to learn, to teach, to use what skills they have to support themselves as part of the revolting people as a community.

We call for the organization of people's assemblies in every city, every public square, every township.

We call for the seizure and use of abandoned buildings, of abandoned land, of every property seized and abandoned by speculators, for the people, for every group that will organize them.

We call for a revolution of the mind as well as the body politic.
I am not sure who well this event will be covered by USMSM since it threatens the status quo. It did cause the Toronto Star to ask "Is the Arab Spring Coming to America?" That's a good question can social media be used as a means for activating the dormant left wing the way it has been used in other countries? The tea party stands for the rich, not disaffected and impoverished youth--youth who have graduated from university with a pile of debt yet see no future.

One protestor, Lisa Fithian, said she's not part of any official group and that the “occupation” of Wall Street is the work of many people coming together for the same purpose and with the same message. "Wall Street is certainly the heart of why we're here. It's the corporations — the big banks in this country have been destroying this country, Overfees or high mortgages, student loans, the banks are touching every aspect of our lives."

She added that banks and the wealthy have taken money for their own interests and their own survival. “The people here are saying enough of that".

OccupyWallStreet--The American Revolution Begins Sept 17th
Occupy Wall Street: Protests Continue on Day 2
Wall St. Protesters Say They’re Settled In
A real Wall Street takeover threat
Social Networking Spurs Wall Street Protest

Double Shooting in Tampa FL - One Dead, One Critical


An argument Saturday morning escalated into a shooting that left one man dead and another critically injured after he turned the gun on himself, authorities said.

Jorge Sanchez, 56, and Luis Alberto Fuente, 45, got into a fight at Sanchez's North Tampa home before 9 a.m. Saturday. Sanchez pulled out a handgun and shot Fuente several times, according to the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office.
Rather than be arrested, Sanchez shot himself in the head and is in critical condition. He was "going through a court dispute based on domestic squabbles with an ex-girlfriend." Plus, he'd "been arrested four times in Hillsborough County since 2006 on charges of domestic battery, according to jail records. The last arrest was in January."

I guess it's safe to say Mr. Sanchez was not a lawful gun owner. But he probably wasn't a criminal either, at least in the sense of doing armed robberies and home invasions for a living. He was like many, he did "odd jobs" to support himself and beat up the wife and girlfriend whenever he felt like it.

I'm the first one to decry the terrible problem of domestic violence and how guns make it worse, but I also see a difference between those guys and the ones who use guns in the commission of their crime, the bank robbers, muggers, etc.

The good news is all of them are prohibited from legally owning guns.  The bad news is gun availability is such that any one of them who wants to can easily own a gun anyway.  That's the problem.

The enforcement of proper gun control laws is the solution.

What's your opinion? You know that traditional argument offered by the pro-gun crowd? They say criminals will get guns anyway and there's nothing we can do about that.

To me that is the lamest most self-serving argument I've ever heard. According to them we should do nothing to limit or prevent the gun flow from lawful gun owners to criminals because if the criminals don't get their guns that way, they'll simply find another.

What's your opinion? Is gun violence a serious enough problem that we should take it seriously? Do you agree that my Solution would, at least in some part, eliminate the access of guns to the bad guys?

Please leave a comment.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

The Solution

1. licensing of gun owners, requiring criminal and mental health background checks.
2. registration of all guns bought.
3. no transfers without the recipient being a licensed gun owner and submitting to another background check - every time.

Safe storage laws, magazine capacity limitations and waiting periods may be eventually added, but the big three above will solve most of our problems.


What do you think? Please leave a comment.

A Constitution Day Quiz

I was remiss in not getting this posted in time for Constitution Day, but as part of the Constitution Day weekend, I hope that readers will still enjoy this form of celebration of our national heritage.  (Because a little more education, and some fun, is a better way to celebrate our founding father's efforts than buying a gun.)

From ConstitutionFacts.com:

1. What was our country's first constitution called?
A. The Articles of Confederation
B. The Declaration of Independence
C. The Federalist Papers
D. The Emancipation Proclamation

2. Laws for the United States are made by:
A. The President
B. The Senate
C. Congress
D. The Supreme Court

3. The longest possible time a person can now serve as President is :
A. 4 years
B. 8 years
C. 10 years
D. 12 years

4. A man accused of a crime in court has a right to:
A. Hear the witness against him.
B. Be tried wherever he wants.
C. Have any judge he wants.
D. Change courts.

5. Invoking the 5th Amendment means an accused man:
A. Refuses to testify against himself
B. Refuses to be tried again
C. Demands a grand jury
D. Wants to appeal his case

6. Our first Vice-President was:
A. Alexander Hamilton
B. Thomas Jefferson
C. Benjamin Franklin
D. John Adams

7. The Bill of Rights is:
A. The First Ten Amendments
B. The Fifteenth Amendments
C. The Entire Constitution
D. All of the Amendments

8. If neither the President, nor the Vice-President can serve, the position would be filled by:
A. The Speaker of the House
B. The Chief Justice
C. The Elected President of the Senate
D. The Secretary of State

9. The major Department Head who is appointed by the President to deal with foreign countries is the:
A. Secretary of Defense
B. Secretary of State
C. Attorney General
D. Secretary of Commerce

10. The President is elected if he:
A. Wins a majority of electoral votes
B. Wins most of the countries votes
C. Wins all of the states votes
D. Wins most of the states votes

I will come back in 24 hours (approximately) and post the answers.  Or, if you don't want to wait, you can follow the link to the web site and take the quiz there.  Following the 10 question quiz, if you are enjoying yourself (or are curious) there is a more advanced and longer quiz.

Enjoy!  Happy Constitution Day!

Proof the SMLE rules!

But I think Lee Ermey makes a fool of himself here.

The bloke with the SMLE's accent sounds as if he's an Aussie to me and is wearing an Aussie slouch hat with badge. The only thing that makes me wonder if he is Aussie is that he isn't giving Ermey what for about the mix up.

If he is an Aussie, he should also point out the Australians used the MK. III into the 1950s (Lithgow stopped production in 1953) Not to mention the Pakistanis and Indians were using them into the 60s-70s.

"Hey, Ermey How did you like being in the Canadian Navy????"

Sunday with the NRA

Gunman kills 1 at central Fla. home, then wounds 2 others at church a block away


LAKELAND, Fla. — Authorities say a man shot and killed a person at a home in central Florida, then shot two others at a church about a block away.
The Polk County Sheriff’s Office says it was not immediately known if a suspect was in custody Sunday.

Cortez the Killer