Doesn't "within city limits" mean there are places outside of the city where the happy gun owner can get the necessary training? Is that so "onerous?"The city’s ban on handguns was struck down by the Supreme Court in McDonald vs. Chicago, but the city has a policy requiring that registered gun owners get gun training including instruction at a gun range while simultaneously banning gun ranges within city limits.
How do you get gun training at a facility the city outlaws? That doesn’t matter. You’re not really supposed to own a gun.
Why do gun rights fanatics find it necessary to exaggerate like this? Isn't the reality of the situation enough for them to complain about? Do these people have no moral sense of honesty?
What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.