This is why it's harder to argue against someone who's consistent. I want the Boston bomber to be tried according to our laws. He should have been read his rights. The dead suspect's wife and any other woman--or man, for that matter--has the right to wear a scarf, a veil, or a set of Vulcan ears, if her religion requires such attire. Deciding who we let into this country is a different matter, since it's not a right for foreigners to become American citizens or even to study here, but I'd oppose any religious test.
I've been consistent on those views for a long time. I oppose indefinite detention. I supported the building of a mosque in New York--or wherever else. I've spoken out against the PATRIOT Act since before it became law.
Have fun attacking easy targets. When all of you are ready to discuss these things with me, let me know.
Some guys like looking at her? I don't know, nor do I care. If I could get you and Laci and Dog Gone to see that I'm not like Fox News, that, at least, would be something. But all your side wants to do is fight straw men.
Laci, the terrorist that is still alive is a citizen, and therefore entitled to all of his rights. The judicial tomfoolery that allowed them to interrogate him without being mirandized seems a little off to me. I'm thinking that this will likely come back to bite the prosecuters in the ass eventually.
So Fox, Lindsey Graham, John McCain and other Republicans are hypocrites?
Shocking!
Just like Democrats and progressives claim to respect other various civil rights, but shred the 2nd Amendment, try to make justifications for ignoring it, or make up tortured new interpretations of it to negate its applicability.
Hypocrisy abounds!
Course, there always remains the option to defend All of the rights in the Constitution...what a novel idea...
Just don't count on the people in Boston to help defend the document. The progressive/liberal/socialists there applauded and cheered the document's Bill of Rights destruction.
Any claim that progressives respect civil liberties is a bunch of hooey.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYeah, terrorists don't have any rights under the other amendments, but let them exercise their Second Amendment rights!
ReplyDeleteThis is why it's harder to argue against someone who's consistent. I want the Boston bomber to be tried according to our laws. He should have been read his rights. The dead suspect's wife and any other woman--or man, for that matter--has the right to wear a scarf, a veil, or a set of Vulcan ears, if her religion requires such attire. Deciding who we let into this country is a different matter, since it's not a right for foreigners to become American citizens or even to study here, but I'd oppose any religious test.
ReplyDeleteI've been consistent on those views for a long time. I oppose indefinite detention. I supported the building of a mosque in New York--or wherever else. I've spoken out against the PATRIOT Act since before it became law.
Have fun attacking easy targets. When all of you are ready to discuss these things with me, let me know.
Why do you think Ann Coulter is so popular? Why does she sell millions of books and get invited on shows like Fox?
DeleteSome guys like looking at her? I don't know, nor do I care. If I could get you and Laci and Dog Gone to see that I'm not like Fox News, that, at least, would be something. But all your side wants to do is fight straw men.
DeleteMike, For some reason this post's link isnt working.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Fixed it.
DeleteLaci, the terrorist that is still alive is a citizen, and therefore entitled to all of his rights. The judicial tomfoolery that allowed them to interrogate him without being mirandized seems a little off to me. I'm thinking that this will likely come back to bite the prosecuters in the ass eventually.
ReplyDeleteSo Fox, Lindsey Graham, John McCain and other Republicans are hypocrites?
ReplyDeleteShocking!
Just like Democrats and progressives claim to respect other various civil rights, but shred the 2nd Amendment, try to make justifications for ignoring it, or make up tortured new interpretations of it to negate its applicability.
Hypocrisy abounds!
Course, there always remains the option to defend All of the rights in the Constitution...what a novel idea...
Just don't count on the people in Boston to help defend the document. The progressive/liberal/socialists there applauded and cheered the document's Bill of Rights destruction.
DeleteAny claim that progressives respect civil liberties is a bunch of hooey.
orlin sellers