So does someone have a problem with this, for some reason? If, for some reason, one does have a problem with a restaurant that serves alcohol attached to a gun range, would this strange person not object to a gun range next door to the restaurant? Down the street? A couple blocks over? Across town? I'd love to learn the rationale.
Apparently guns and alcohol won't be allowed to mix, at least not in the immediate area.
"They were reportedly swayed by the business' strict rules against shooting after drinking. Everyone who eats or drinks at the restaurant will have to submit to an ID scan, and if they've had alcohol, they won't be allowed to shoot at the range that day, WFTV reports. In addition, guns won't be allowed in the restaurant, though commissioners pointed out that the policy won't stop people with concealed carry licenses from entering. Patrons who go to the gun range will also have to sign an affidavit promising they're not drunk."
Minnesota also does not ban permit holders from entering bars, though it does bar them from being intoxicated. Not many problems with that here.
"WFTV reports. In addition, guns won't be allowed in the restaurant, though commissioners pointed out that the policy won't stop people with concealed carry licenses from entering." So what point are you trying to make SS? The lie that guns won't be allowed in the restaurant? When it clearly states that guns will be allowed in the restaurant.
Anon, do you actually read the comments before you reply to them? If you had, you would have seen I was referring to the range not allowing patrons who had been drinking to shoot.
"Everyone who eats or drinks at the restaurant will have to submit to an ID scan, and if they've had alcohol, they won't be allowed to shoot at the range that day, WFTV reports."
You forgot this part Anon, which makes it quite clear. And you didn't really quote me, you used part of a quote from the article.
So does someone have a problem with this, for some reason? If, for some reason, one does have a problem with a restaurant that serves alcohol attached to a gun range, would this strange person not object to a gun range next door to the restaurant? Down the street? A couple blocks over? Across town? I'd love to learn the rationale.
ReplyDeleteApparently guns and alcohol won't be allowed to mix, at least not in the immediate area.
ReplyDelete"They were reportedly swayed by the business' strict rules against shooting after drinking. Everyone who eats or drinks at the restaurant will have to submit to an ID scan, and if they've had alcohol, they won't be allowed to shoot at the range that day, WFTV reports. In addition, guns won't be allowed in the restaurant, though commissioners pointed out that the policy won't stop people with concealed carry licenses from entering.
Patrons who go to the gun range will also have to sign an affidavit promising they're not drunk."
Minnesota also does not ban permit holders from entering bars, though it does bar them from being intoxicated. Not many problems with that here.
"WFTV reports. In addition, guns won't be allowed in the restaurant, though commissioners pointed out that the policy won't stop people with concealed carry licenses from entering."
DeleteSo what point are you trying to make SS? The lie that guns won't be allowed in the restaurant? When it clearly states that guns will be allowed in the restaurant.
Anon, do you actually read the comments before you reply to them? If you had, you would have seen I was referring to the range not allowing patrons who had been drinking to shoot.
DeleteI quoted you.
DeleteWhy do gun loons have to lie.
"Everyone who eats or drinks at the restaurant will have to submit to an ID scan, and if they've had alcohol, they won't be allowed to shoot at the range that day, WFTV reports."
DeleteYou forgot this part Anon, which makes it quite clear. And you didn't really quote me, you used part of a quote from the article.
I quoted you liar, but of course you change the point. Typical for a dishonest gun loon. Why do gun loons have to lie?
Delete