Definitely need to suppress the skittles and the ice tea. Extremely prejudicial. Makes it sound like Martin was just a kid bopping over to the convenience store.
The question to be determined here is which one, Martin or Zimmerman, is to blame for what happened.
But calling someone a thug is based on the person's actions, at least when I do it. The evidence presented to date shows Martin to be a teenager who was buying into that kind of life. Still, the questions remains: Who started the fight? Did Martin do something that warranted Zimmerman's action?
Definitely need to suppress the skittles and the ice tea. Extremely prejudicial. Makes it sound like Martin was just a kid bopping over to the convenience store.
ReplyDeleteThere seems to be no link here mike.
ReplyDeleteThe question to be determined here is which one, Martin or Zimmerman, is to blame for what happened.
ReplyDeleteBut calling someone a thug is based on the person's actions, at least when I do it. The evidence presented to date shows Martin to be a teenager who was buying into that kind of life. Still, the questions remains: Who started the fight? Did Martin do something that warranted Zimmerman's action?