Except for the boy being taken from his family and forced to fight as an insurgent against the government and the girl not, they are very much alike. And you say the gun rights side go to ridiculous extremes in depicting politicians as potential tyrants. Hmmm, an interesting thought, I was wondering how Mike's definition of a hidden criminal that he likes to use when referring to gun owners could potentially be used with politicians.
Guns do more harm than good, therefore, encouraging/allowing children to use, carry, be exposed to, have access to, or even be near guns is a form of abuse. Ask Dr. Charles Bizilj.
Mikeb, the idea that guns do more harm than good is your assertion, but don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining. If you don't want a gun, don't have one. But that child in Texas is not being harmed, and the fact that you claim she is shows why you must never win.
Greg, the "assertion" has been proven many times. Even compared to your most liberal DGU esitmates, you know the ones that add 90% for brandishings and snake scarings, even compared to them the harm done with guns is greater. It's simple arithmetic. That being so, giving a gun to a kid is a form of child abuse.
Except for the boy being taken from his family and forced to fight as an insurgent against the government and the girl not, they are very much alike. And you say the gun rights side go to ridiculous extremes in depicting politicians as potential tyrants.
ReplyDeleteHmmm, an interesting thought, I was wondering how Mike's definition of a hidden criminal that he likes to use when referring to gun owners could potentially be used with politicians.
Both are examples of child abuse.
DeleteWhay, specifically, is the abuse in the Texas picture?
DeleteGuns do more harm than good, therefore, encouraging/allowing children to use, carry, be exposed to, have access to, or even be near guns is a form of abuse. Ask Dr. Charles Bizilj.
DeleteMikeb, the idea that guns do more harm than good is your assertion, but don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining. If you don't want a gun, don't have one. But that child in Texas is not being harmed, and the fact that you claim she is shows why you must never win.
DeleteGreg, the "assertion" has been proven many times. Even compared to your most liberal DGU esitmates, you know the ones that add 90% for brandishings and snake scarings, even compared to them the harm done with guns is greater. It's simple arithmetic. That being so, giving a gun to a kid is a form of child abuse.
DeleteThe fact that you can't tell the difference speaks volumes about why gun control must never win.
ReplyDeleteWhy, that Somali boy is just "exercising his rights," right??
ReplyDelete