Yeah, we know the entire progun argument is based on lies and half-truths, such as John Lott's obviously bullshit "More guns, Less crime" and the disproven Kleck DGU study.
Anyway, the perp wore flip flops.
More here.
It doesn't look like having a gun is the best method of self-defence...
Sounds like a couple of Obama voters to me.
ReplyDeleteTypical gun loon reply who doesn't care where guns end up , or who gets killed by them.
DeleteBloomberg is constantly surrounded by 4 armed gun loons with hi-cap magazines. A little hypocritical, huh?
DeleteIs it 4 guards? Is it constant? Do they have high cap mags? Or, are you just spouting off at the mough?
DeleteFrom the time he leaves his house to the time he returns, then there are the guards that surround his house 24-7.
DeleteYou don't know that. You're just repeating the made-up shit you've heard from other gun nuts.
DeleteI don't know the details of Bloomberg's security arrangements, and can only imagine what I'd be accused of if I were discovered trying to discover those details, but we definitely know that he is accustomed to extensive armed protection even where it's forbidden to us lowly menials.
DeleteDo you question, Mikeb, that Bloomberg has far more armed security, in far more circumstances, than he would want available to the vast majority of the citizenry?
He's a billionaire. He's a celebrity politician. His need for armed protection in some circumstances is understandable. Poor, persecuted average Joe can't afford it and hasn't the need. This is more trumped up bullshit from you.
DeleteAh, yes. He's among the one percent of the one percent of the one percent, so his life is worth more than the lives of the other 99.9999% of us.
DeleteGot it.
Joe can't afford to pay four people to follow him around wherever he goes, but he can afford to buy and carry his own gun.
DeleteNobody's stopping poor persecuted Joe from owning and even carrying a gun - if he qualifies.
Delete- if he qualifies.
DeletePrecisely the point. How does one "qualify" as having a life worth defending? By being a billionaire? Who decides whose lives are unworthy of protection?
I'd put Bloomberg very near the top of that list.
Joe cannot carry a gun in New York City.
DeleteHow many people not carrying guns were robbed? I guess it doesn't look like not having a gun is the best method of self-"defence."
ReplyDeleteIt's possible that there is a stupider response than this, but I'm damned if I could write it. What specifically does the safety of non-gunsuck non-ammosexual non-perverts have to do with the robbery of stupid gunsuck ammosexual morons (repetitive, I realize)? Eh?
DeleteIt's possible that there is a stupider response than this, but I'm damned if I could write it.
DeleteActually, you just did, and as it turns out, I think you're way too modest--you manage stupider responses with every comment you make! Congrats!
Though not required to in my home state, I prefer to conceal for tactical reasons. I even have some information regarding Kurt's possibly rhetorical question.
ReplyDelete"With a crime rate of 49 per one thousand residents, Gresham has one of the highest crime rates in America compared to all communities of all sizes - from the smallest towns to the very largest cities. One's chance of becoming a victim of either violent or property crime here is one in 20. Within Oregon, more than 90% of the communities have a lower crime rate than Gresham."
"Now let us turn to take a look at how Gresham does for violent crimes specifically, and then how it does for property crimes. This is important because the overall crime rate can be further illuminated by understanding if violent crime or property crimes (or both) are the major contributors to the general rate of crime in Gresham."
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/or/gresham/crime/#description
Personally, I would not willingly go there on a bet, much less wander around at 2am. But then, if I HAD to go there for some reason, packing a gun would be a wise move. Even Mike has mentioned in the past his belief that he seems to be ok with carrying in high crime areas.
Just because you conceal your gun you think no one can tell you are packing? HA HA HA HA HA
ReplyDeleteIt would be so easy to take away a gun from a gun loon walking around in public.
You loons really think you are invincible. HA HA HA HA HA
"Just because you conceal your gun you think no one can tell you are packing?"
DeleteIt doesn't really matter if they do or not. At least in Minnesota. Never heard anyone mention it.
"It would be so easy to take away a gun from a gun loon walking around in public."
That could be a hazardous hobby for you Anon. Especially if your snatch target is a police officer. Wouldn't that be interesting....
Again with the smart ass comments. I hope it happens to you, it happens to others all the time, but you in your idiocy think it's not possible.
DeleteIt would be interesting if the different Anonymous commenters had #s or something to distinguish them. The arguments between "anonymous" and "anonymous" read like something out of Tom Stoddard.
DeleteI was thinking more like Gollum talking to himself. Not much to be done about it though.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_aziIIp8U8
Your own mistakes prove your anon rant to be specious and I offered to let you name me, but as usual no reply. A typical coward, given the opportunity, you refused.
DeleteYou, on the other hand, have every opportunity to name yourself but refuse to do so. Coward. Snort!
DeleteHey snort, yes I made a decision to post as anon., and your childish remarks have not changed my mind. It is SS who has a problem with it, yet, he has no problem with you being anon. His typical hypocrisy on the anon issue is noted. I have explained before that stating something as anon. would not change that opinion if I said it with some name. And SS has proven that he pays no attention, given he has mistaken a named person for an anon. more than once and has been forced to admit that mistake only after given definitive proof many times. That proof was given on the same thread he made the mistake, yet, he still denied it. That's why I told him to save his disingenuous apology. He is just playing games as you do, enjoy yourself.
DeleteHey anon snort, SS most likely has the same problem with me choosing to be a anon. Mike B has certainly has a problem, as well as you about me choosing to be a anon as well. But Mike has no problem about you being a anon. The grass is just as green on either side of the fence. So you, just like me, can either name yourself or shut up about it OR Mike can take the anon profile off of the profile choices then NONE can be a anon. Then who will you choose to be? Or will you even comment here anymore? Or will I? Interesting thing about being a anon, its hiding who you really are isn't it!
DeleteHey dip anon., I'm not the one ranting about anon., SS is and he is a lying hypocrite on the issue. Take it up with him. By now.
Delete