arma virumque cano (et alia)
This has been legal in Florida for years and there has been problems before and while it is not something I would do,if he is acting within the law on his property without changing the law their is not much that can be done by those who oppose him acting within the law.http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/oddnews/homemade-gun-range-on-owner-s-residential-yard-is-legal--according-to-florida-statute-230019514.html Title XLVICRIMES Chapter 790WEAPONS AND FIREARMS View Entire Chapter790.15 Discharging firearm in public or on residential property.—(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) or subsection (3), any person who knowingly discharges a firearm in any public place or on the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street, who knowingly discharges any firearm over the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street or over any occupied premises, or who recklessly or negligently discharges a firearm outdoors on any property used primarily as the site of a dwelling as defined in s. 776.013 or zoned exclusively for residential use commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This section does not apply to a person lawfully defending life or property or performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm or to a person discharging a firearm on public roads or properties expressly approved for hunting by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or Florida Forest Service.
You wouldn't do it, but you defend his doing it. That's weak. If it's wrong it's wrong. If the law needs to be improved, fine, but don't defend dangerous and irresponsible activity meanwhile.
"You wouldn't do it, but you defend his doing it. That's weak. If it's wrong it's wrong. If the law needs to be improved, fine, but don't defend dangerous and irresponsible activity meanwhile."......Mike I never said anything of the sort..Please tell me how I defended him?....By pointing out that there was not much that could be done while he was acting inside the law?....That was not defending him it was merely pointing out that none of his neighbors had a leg to stand on from a legal position. Ya they could get him for noise ordinance violation but if he was using a suppressor they could not even get him for that....The type of behavior he was hoping to engage in is dangerous and reckless but legal
No response after your unfounded allegations Mike?
I think that the main point is that this guy is a total, fucking dick.
Just because it's legal doesn't make it the safe, responsible, or the correct thing to do. A lesson gun loons obviously don't consider making them immoral in the face of needless gun shot deaths they are unwilling to confront and help stop even thopugh it will not infringe on their right to buy, own, or use guns.
Hey Sandra, remember the legal issue?
Thanks for making my point gun loon.
Your welcome anti loon.
Thank you criminal thinker.