arma virumque cano (et alia)
So what of that was incorrect?
This title, "Glenn Beck Losing It" presupposes that he 'had it' to begin with.What kind of loony actually watches this clown?
Muddy, All "Progressives", as a matter of fact if it wasn't for the modern Marxist, I don't think Mr. Beck would HAVE a show.
Weer'd makes a very good point. The antis want to ban guns from the law abiding so that criminals won't have a source. So let's apply that logic here.You want to stop Glenn Beck and his show, then ban and get rid of all of the Communists. If you have no filthy commies, then no Glenn speak.Its for the children. It is common sense Marxist control. Even if it saves just one normal American capitalist, it is worth the inconvenience for all socialist hippy loons.
FWM asks, "So what of that was incorrect?"I'm sure some of that drivel on the blackboard was wrong, but I'm thinking about his attitude, his obsessive anti-Obama attitude,
"I'm sure some of that drivel on the blackboard was wrong, but I'm thinking about his attitude, his obsessive anti-Obama attitude"So it is not that he is lying, he may be telling the truth, but he does not like the "anointed one" so that makes him wrong?I thought you were taking issue with what he was saying but it turns out that you just don't like the fact that he is saying it and people are listening.I don't watch his show but every time you post a clip and I ask what you had issue with and you fail to reply, at least now I understand why. It is not what he says but instead it is the fact that he says it that bothers the liberals.