Case in point, Mike W. loves to accuse gun-control folks of making those penis jokes and then to tell us how bad that is. The fact is, it usually starts with him. In this post he linked to another post OF HIS, in which he did the same thing.
This weird debating technique is not limited to the penis. Gun-rights advocates do this very same thing in any number of other areas. They exaggerate what we say or twist the meaning and then argue against that as if we'd really said it.
Why do they keep resorting to such shabby tactics if they're right, if they have god and the Constitution on their side? Seems odd, no?
Please leave a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment