Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Indiana Concealed Carry Permit Holder Gets Arrested in WalMart

Opposing Views reports

Kenneth Pirtle was charged with criminal recklessness with a firearm after his handgun accidentally fired inside a Walmart in Jasper, Ind., on Sunday morning.

Pirtle, 65, was in a check-out line when he reached into his pocket and accidentally discharged his .40 caliber handgun.
The bullet shot through Pirtle's pants leg, hit the floor and then ricocheted into a wall, according to police.
Pirtle suffered minor injuries to his leg, but he refused treatment for reasons unknown.
Fortunately, there were no other injuries.
Police believe that other objects in Pirtle’s pocket might have helped cause the accidental shooting.
The incident is still being investigated.
Now, what's so hard about that?  The dangerous gun owner was arrested and the investigation continues.

Ohio Concealed Weapons Holder Accidentally Shoots Self, Driver

Local news reports

A concealed carry permit holder accidentally shot himself and another man while sitting in the passenger seat of a car on the city's East Side, Cleveland police said.

The shooting happened about 7 p.m. Sunday near East 103rd Street and Pierpont Avenue.
The bullet ripped through the gun owner's hand before it passed through the driver's right leg and lodged in his left leg, police said.

Emergency medical crews drove the men to hospitals, according to spokesman Sgt. Ali Pillow.

Officers learned the man handling the weapon has a CCW permit, Pillow said. Investigators confiscated the gun.

I'll bet he gets his gun back with a stiff warning to be more careful in the future.  What do you think?


Joseph Houseman, 'Open Carry' Advocate, Gets His Rifle Back After Tense Police Standoff

Huffington Post

Hillary Clinton On Gun Control: We Can't Let 'A Minority Of People' Terrorize The Majority

Huffington Post

Do you really love your family and want to protect them?

Then, get rid of your guns.

Seriously,  they are more of a danger to your family.  But, that isn't what you want to hear, or what the people who control your thinking want you to hear.

After all, remember the study that caused your lot to want to stop all the gun violence research?

Arthur Kellerman and colleagues, “Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home”

And things haven't been going too well for the "gun in the home makes you safer" side as their studies are discredited while the peer researched studies pile up showing that you put your families at risk by bringing a gun into the home, as this article in Slate points out.
The overwhelming empirical evidence indicates that the presence of a gun makes children less safe; that programs such as Eddie Eagle are insufficient; and that measures the NRA and extreme gun advocates vehemently oppose, such as gun safes and smart guns, could dramatically reduce the death toll. Study after study unequivocally demonstrates that the prevalence of firearms directly increases the risk of youth homicide, suicide, and unintentional death. This effect is consistent across the United States and throughout the world. As a country, we should be judged by how well we protect our children. By any measure, we are failing horribly.

The United States accounts for nearly 75 percent of all children murdered in the developed world. Children between the ages of 5 and 14 in the United States are 17 times more likely to be murdered by firearms than children in other industrialized nations.
Children from states where firearms are prevalent suffer from significantly higher rates of homicide, even after accounting for poverty, education, and urbanization. A study focusing on youth in North Carolina found that most of these deaths were caused by legally purchased handguns. A recent meta-analysis revealed that easy access to firearms doubled the risk of homicide and tripled the risk for suicide among all household members. Family violence is also much more likely to be lethal in homes where a firearm is present, placing children especially in danger. Murder-suicides are another major risk to children and are most likely to be committed with a gun.


Crucially, these deaths are not offset by defensive gun use. As one study found, for every time a gun is used legally in self-defense at home, there are “four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides.” A study of adolescents in California found that there were 13 times as many threatening as self-defensive uses of guns. Of the defensive encounters, many arose in confrontations that became hostile because of the presence of a firearm.
Hey, you can believe what you want since you lot tend to be "fact adverse".

But the even scarier thing is this:
As a report from the New York Times revealed, accidental killings are significantly underreported in the official data, often being classified as homicides or suicides rather than accidents. In several states there were twice as many accidental gun deaths than the official record indicated.

It seems that having a gun isn't going to make your home safer: in fact, you are making it more likely that there will be a serious or fatal injury.

It's your choice if you want to be ignorant, but I know you will choose ignorance everytime.

It's what your masters want you to do--and you mindlessly do or believe what your masters tell you to do.

And try to show me how smart you are by doing that.

You wonder WHY I don't listen to you?

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

More info on the Straw Purchase SCOTUS decision

From USA TODAY:

The 5-4 decision upheld two lower courts that had ruled against so-called straw purchasers, even though the justices acknowledged that Congress left loopholes in gun control laws passed in the 1960s and 1990s.

For gun purchasers to be allowed to buy from licensed dealers without reporting the actual final owners of the firearms, the justices said, would make little sense.

"Putting true numbskulls to one side, anyone purchasing a gun for criminal purposes would avoid leaving a paper trail by the simple expedient of hiring a straw," Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the slim majority.

"No piece of information is more important under federal firearms law than the identity of a gun's purchaser — the person who acquires a gun as a result of a transaction with a licensed dealer," Kagan said.

During oral arguments in the case in January, she had noted that without such a finding, "it does not matter whether the ultimate transferee was Al Capone or somebody else."

Gun control advocates were delighted with the decision. "This is a very big and very positive decision that will save lives by keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people," said Dan Gross, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
It was the second ruling from the conservative court this term that went against the gun lobby. In March, the justices ruled unanimously that a federal law intended to keep guns away from domestic violence offenders can apply even if their crime was nothing more than "offensive touching."

Thank you, SCOTUS -- and hooray for you especially, Justice Kagan.

This points out the flaws as well in not requiring a background check on EVERY gun purchase. PERIOD.

An observation from a facebook friend

A facebook friend observes:
I have noticed one very big difference between guns rights supporters and gun violence prevention supporters.

Gun violence prevention supporters post pictures of their dead or injured children, spouses, parents, friends...guns rights supporters post pictures of their guns.
Interesting point.