Commenter TS demands to know:
Secondly, who are you to play God? Even if you make the big assumption that disarming people will save net lives (which you are yet to prove without selectively dismissing data that doesn’t agree with your position), you are still saying that some people should die so that others (more?) will live.
First, I don't play God. Or the Flying Spaghetti Monster for that matter.
Second, you still seem to be under the impression that gun control is all about taking guns away from everyone or some other such apocalyptic event. Instead, gun control is about making sure those who shouldn't have access to firearms--don't.
Third, you continue to labor under the belief that a gun will magically render you immune from harm. No wonder there are people who believe in Sarah Palin.
Last, perhaps TS will tell us why he believes that we should happily accept gun deaths many magnitudes greater than the relative few lives that are saved by firearms.