Friday, July 5, 2013

Adam Kokesh Explains How to Stop the Government from Taking away Our Humanity


  Freak Out Nation

Adam Kokesh, the guy who planned an armed march on Washington D.C., has declared it to be a success. Contrary to his claim of success, the gun march was supposed to be today, and it was cancelled due to the police chief explaining that an armed march is not legal in D.C. and she will meet them before they cross the county line.

 Kokesh says, “We will not be silenced, we will not obey, we will not allow our government to destroy our humanity. We are the final, American, revolution. See you next Independence Day!”

 Adam’s definition of ‘success‘, must be that U.S. Park Police are aware of the video, according to a spokesman, and responded by going to Freedom Plaza to investigate the matter. Park Police officers did not find Kokesh, or any sign of a protest going on in the vicinity, nor can they determine how the video was recorded, and if and when Kokesh may have been to Freedom Plaza with a gun. And where are his fellow gun fondlers who are supposed to march beside him?
Posted by at

12 comments:

  1. Retired MustangJuly 5, 2013 at 5:50 PM

    I did not weigh in on the Kokesh issue before his scheduled march. Based on what I could learn, I concluded he was a self-serving loudmouth who was seeking to attract attention to himself rather than to the cause of freedom. My opinion of him hasn't changed. Because of my belief that he wants any attention he can get, I refused to provide even the meager amount my comments might provide. Barring something unforeseen, this is the last comment I will make concerning him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownJuly 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM

      It sounds to me like he espouses all the things you profess to believe in. Do you put him in the same category as Ted Nugent and what's that nut's name from Tennessee?

      Why don't you support those guys?

      Delete
  2. Greg CampJuly 5, 2013 at 7:58 PM

    Gun fondlers, eh. It's cute when people who would object to sexist language in any other context use sexist language about guns. If you believe in the equality of the sexes, using sexual symbols to denegrate anyone is outside the pale.

    Oh, well, no one ever accused gun control freaks of being logical or consistent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownJuly 6, 2013 at 11:19 AM

      That's bullshit, Greg. "Fondling" is not a sexist term. It has a sexual connotation like "fetish" does, but it's not sexist.

      Delete
    2. Greg CampJuly 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM

      It is a demeaning term. You use it in that way, and so do your fellow travellers. Why can't you be honest?

      Delete
    3. UnknownJuly 6, 2013 at 3:47 PM

      Fine, demeaning, not sexist. You were wrong but you're not honest enough to admit it.

      Delete
    4. Greg CampJuly 7, 2013 at 12:34 AM

      Using a sexual term to demean someone is sexist. Sexism can be against men or women.

      Tell me this: Is there a language that you do use well?

      Delete
    5. UnknownJuly 7, 2013 at 10:35 AM

      Your need to never admit a mistake is pathological.

      Delete
    6. Greg CampJuly 8, 2013 at 2:38 PM

      When you can show me making one, I'll acknowledge it.

      Delete
  3. japeteJuly 5, 2013 at 10:37 PM

    These guys are very good at making things up. What rally? Even the rally with toy guns only had 20 people at it to "tweak the nose of the government" and show President Obama who's the boss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greg CampJuly 6, 2013 at 9:57 AM

      Pot, meet Kettle.

      Delete
    2. Greg CampJuly 6, 2013 at 2:28 PM

      Making things up? I see gun control freaks do that every day. You have no moral high ground to speak from.

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)