Saturday, November 30, 2013

Lawful Georgia Gun Owner Stands His Ground Against an Alzheimer's Sufferer - Kills Him - Naturally No Charges



Absolutely disgraceful interpretation by the sheriff. How in the world could anyone think the shooter felt threatened to the point of leaving the house, pursuing the supposedly threatening figure and shooting at him four times in the middle of the night?  The threat was an unarmed and helpless Alzheimer's sufferer. Where exactly was the lethal threat or the threat of serious bodily harm?

I'll tell you where.  It was in the paranoid mind of the gun owner. Like so many gun owners, this guy was totally unfit and incapable of distinguishing between a real and an imagined threat. And what's even worse is the pro-gun-nut Sheriff Wilson supports him in this incident which is nothing short of manslaughter.

32 comments:

  1. Another NRA caused problem. Without the NRA telling all the gunsuck gunwack paranoid losers like Greg that they are in danger, people would not shoot first. Fucking NRA turds can burn in hell. I hope they all have relative who get shot by other losers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some Alzheimer's sufferers become violent and aggressive, due to their illness. Did you notice how the shooting happened ten minutes into the 911 call? That should tell you something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's Greg again defending a needless death. No surprise.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, it tells me that gunsucks are liable to kill innocent bystanders at any time. You cannot trust an armed gunsuck, because his delusions may result in your death at any time for any reason.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, Greg, what the fuck are you talking about? Alzheimer's patients are violent, are you that fucking defensive of the misuse of a gun?

      Delete
    4. Mikeb, I said some are violent. Given the facts that we've seen in this case and the judgement of the sheriff, it looks as though this was a justified shooting. That could be wrong, but the facts support the home owner's account.

      Your side has to exaggerate everything to create the appearance of a point.

      Delete
    5. "How in the world could anyone think the shooter felt threatened to the point of leaving the house, pursuing the supposedly threatening figure and shooting at him four times in the middle of the night?"

      Greg would do the same thing. He said so before. Remember the drug dealer? The dealer did nothing to Greg, but Greg said he would hunt him down with his gun, and not bother to call the police.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous, I generally ignore you, since your comments are bullshit, but would you stop lying? I said that I understood the motivation of a retired soldier who went after a drug dealer who refused to stop poisoning his friend. Now, if you can't understand that motiviation, to me that says you sympathize with the drug dealer.

      Delete
    7. No, Greg, you said a bit more than you understand his motivations. Don't make me go back and dredge up the past.

      Your defense of this Georgia cowboy is despicable, just like the sheriff's is.

      Delete
    8. Here we go:

      http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2013/09/on-cnns-crossfire-van-jones-exposes.html

      http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2013/09/persian-gulf-war-vet-wins-battle-with.html

      Read my comments about this carefully. You'll note that I express understanding. But that doesn't mean that I would act in the same manner, and the veteran didn't use his gun to attack the drug dealer. What I would do is dependent on the circumstances. Certainly, if I were on the jury in a trial of the veteran, I'd vote not guilty.

      Mikeb, can we stop playing memory games? It's fun for me to win, but really, there are better things to do.

      Delete
    9. Engaging in illegal behavior and promoting others to do the same; and you did say you would go after (hunt him down) him. What a lying criminal coward.

      Delete
    10. In reading the thread, it is quite clear not only did Greg not say that he would do the same thing, but there is no actual victim of a threat since the subject is some unidentified drug dealer in Ohio 7 years ago. You need a real victim for a threat. I stand by my belief that what Greg said is protected speech, and not a threat. We also see that even three months ago you jumped on Greg for not wanting to call the police, but you still haven't called the police on what you believe to be a serious crime. That tells me you agree it's not a threat.

      Delete
    11. It's so cute how gun control freaks tell the world that we gun owners are so volatile and dangerous, but then call us "lying criminal cowards." Of course, providing evidence for either of those claims is too much for their limited intellects.

      Delete
    12. How about the Alzheimer shooting, Greg. Do you understand that one too? I think you said as much, or did you go even further with your disgusting defense of what this Georgia idiot did?

      Delete
    13. Mikeb, I'll answer your question when you admit that once again, you were wrong in your characterization of my comments.

      Delete
    14. Gee, more lies from criminal liars. What a surprise.

      Delete
    15. I provided multiple examples of proof that you are a criminal liar, which you refuse to respond to. Another lie from the criminal coward.

      Delete
    16. No, Greg, I can't do that. Unlike you, I try to maintain a bit of integrity and tell the truth. You defend every dangerous lunatic I present on these pages. And then when called on it you deny deny deny.

      Delete
    17. Mikeb, you said that I did more than express my understanding for the retired soldier's actions, and I showed you that you were wrong.

      In the case of this article, the facts suggest that the home owner was defending himself. There may be more to the story, as always, but on the face of it, the shooter was defending himself and his family. That's not a definitive answer, just an assessment of the facts we have.

      Delete
    18. How the hell was he defending himself and his family, by pursuing the unarmed old man with Alzheimer's and shooting him dead? How in the hell do you see legitimate defense in that? First you tried to suggest that Alzheimer's sufferers are sometimes violent. Then, what, you're using just basic stand your ground and castle doctrine policy? Please explain how it was defensive.

      Delete
    19. As I said, I'm going on what has been reported here and on the word of the local sheriff. But someone on another's property, acting in a dangerous manner, is a threat. Is that what happened here? That seems likely, since the sheriff didn't see the need for an arrest.

      Delete
    20. Greg, an elderly Alzheimer's sufferer cannot possibly have been "acting in a dangerous manner." The fact that the trigger-happy gun owner says so AFTER THE FACT is suspect to say the least. And Deputy Dawg is no better, that's just one gun jut standing up for another - and you make three.

      Delete
    21. Mikeb, apparently you haven't talked much to people who work with Alzheimer's patients.

      Delete
    22. Greg going by facts, HA HA HA HA
      How could the man be a threat if the homeowner was chasing him? If the homeowner was chasing him, he obviously was not a threat.Why didn't the home owner just let him run away? No, he killed the guy.
      Please prove that you have medical experience with Alzheimer patients.

      Delete
    23. Typical, the lying coward has no response.

      Delete
  3. If anyone defends this kind of shit, I only wish that it happens to their father or mother, or better yet, to them. This is shit. This guy should be charged with murder. if I lived in the area, vendetta would be on my mind. And THAT is where the gunsuck assholes are driving our society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will Anonymous, et al., come around to say that POed Lib is a criminal?

      Delete
    2. Uh oh, Steve is going to be on you real hard for threatening vigilante justice.

      Delete
    3. Yes, anyone who promotes vigil anti justice is breaking the law, thus a criminal.

      Delete
    4. Another example how TS and Greg are criminals and promote criminal actions. Vigil anti justice, is against the law. Thanks for proving again that you are criminals.

      Delete
    5. That's vigilante, but since offering proof is too hard for you, I'm not surprised that you two couldn't look up basic English, either.

      Delete
    6. Oh gee, that gets you off the hook for promoting vigilante justice, a crime. But we have already proven you are a criminal and promote criminal activity, so no surprise your support another kind of criminal activity.

      Delete