It
seems that Judge Scullin, the judge who invalidated DC's carry ban, reported reimbursement for attending a seminar
in Florida sponsored by the Charles Koch funded George Mason University
Law and Economics Center, aka Mercatus Center in 2010. But I'm sure
that didn't have anything to do with his ultimate ruling. It was just a
coincidence. Right?
www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Frederick-J-Scullin-Jr-Financial-Disclosure-Report-for-2010.pdf
I think the same is true for Silberman (Parker), and Thomas and Scalia: they have all accepted gifts from the Kochs or Koch funded entities.
Where are the judicial ethic rules for Federal Judges? Who enforces them if they exist?
www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Frederick-J-Scullin-Jr-Financial-Disclosure-Report-for-2010.pdf
I think the same is true for Silberman (Parker), and Thomas and Scalia: they have all accepted gifts from the Kochs or Koch funded entities.
Where are the judicial ethic rules for Federal Judges? Who enforces them if they exist?
So a judge that makes a ruling YOU don't like and now its a ethics problem?
ReplyDeleteOne can make a book, a LARGE book on the ethics problem on any politician or any other ruling class in this country. Try to keep up Laci, I know its hard for you, by try anyway.
This type of US corruption is particularly operative in the pro-gun rulings.
DeleteOh I believe that pro gun rulings pale in comparison to other rulings made in the US. You watch only the gun stuff. The nation hears about other things instead. The media doesn't report the gun stuff at all.
DeleteYou may be right.
DeleteIt would be nice if judges stayed out of politics, but as long as people (like anon above) give them a pass, it will never stop. It's not about a decision anon, it's about corruption and money that slants a decision.
ReplyDeleteWhere in my comment did I give anyone a pass?
DeleteYou only pointed out all politicians do it you never condemned it, so you gave it a pass. Obviously if you don't speak out against it when you have the chance, you give it a pass, or worse agree corruption is acceptable, which is probably true as long as it goes your way, otherwise you will cry rights being denied..
DeleteI think I made perfectly clear in my comment that because of their corruption, right, left, center, rear or where ever they stood, that their actions were just that, corrupt. That is condemnation. You on the other hand just like to attack and insert meaning that isn't there to prove some sort of point. I don't even give Laci a pass when she (he) is wrong as well.
DeleteJust because I make a softer point doesn't translate into a "pass". So no, I did not give them a pass.
No, you didn't. Please quote me your condemnation from your original comment.
DeletePlease quote from the original comment where a pass was given.
DeleteTypical GC response, no response after making a false claim.
Delete"One can make a book, a LARGE book on the ethics problem on any politician or any other ruling class in this country. Try to keep up Laci, I know its hard for you, by try anyway."
You admit there is corruption, but don't condemn it. In fact you are telling Laci to simply accept it and then condemn him for not accepting it.
On to your next word twisting BS.
I don't "admit" there is corruption, I pointed it out to be equally on ALL sides. Laci is the one that condemned it, I expanded on her condemnation.
DeleteSo where is the false claim? Now your twisting with BS.
And where is the pass.
Do try to follow logic, it would help you out greatly and not make you look like another idiot.
One false claim by you is that ANY (meaning all) politician(s) are ethically challenged. Do try and follow your own words and skip your usual hypocrisy.
DeleteWell thank you for proving me right, you are an idiot.
DeleteRight HA HA HA HA HA you claim ALL politicians are corrupt, but I'm the idiot HA HA VA HA HA
DeleteYes and YES. And again, thanks for proving me right.
DeleteAnd thanks for proving me correct, that you are just a blabbering fool.
DeleteThere's plenty of corruption to go around on both sides, but you won't hear about it here. It's good corruption if Bloomberg or Soros or OFA does it, but bad corruption if a conservative entity does it.
ReplyDeleteThat's a bullshit accusation, G.
Delete