This is a cross-post with the New Trajectory blog, HERE.
When you picture someone who is
dressed and armed for self-defense and conceal carry, what do you
picture? I picture someone dressed normal, except for a handgun strapped
under their jacket or in a holster at their waist or in their purse.
When you picture someone who is
dressed and armed for hunting, what do you picture? I picture someone in
rugged outdoor clothes, a hunter-red vest and hat, and a long rifle.
 |
| From the Denver Post online. |
When you see the picture to the
right, does this fit either of those images?
To the gun lobby, this picture is
an image of "freedom" and self-defense.
From the article (I've added bolding):
He also came dressed for battle, wearing a gas mask, a combat helmet, a
ballistic vest and armor protecting his legs, throat and groin.
Law enforcement officials said Friday that they are investigating whether
James Eagan Holmes, the 24-year-old suspect, was legally eligible to own all
those weapons and combat gear. But they had found no evidence of a criminal
history that would have prohibited him from buying the weapons used to massacre
moviegoers at a midnight Batman premiere in Aurora.
His only run-in with police:
an October 2011 speeding ticket.
Aurora Police Chief Daniel Oates said Holmes brought a pair
of .40-caliber Glock pistols, an AR-15 military-style rifle and a Remington
shotgun to the Century Aurora 16 complex, but it was unclear whether he used
them all as he strode through the theater, shooting people apparently at
random. One Glock pistol was found in his white Hyundai when police arrested
him outside the car, he said. Oates said Holmes purchased 6,000 rounds of
ammunition and multiple magazines, including a drum magazine able to hold 100
cartridges, from stores and on the Internet.
Oates also said investigators have not yet determined how
many shots were fired or how many gun magazines were brought to the theater to
carry out the midnight massacre.
But "many, many rounds were fired," he said.
According to one law enforcement source, the gunman could
easily have shot police officers as they approached because of all his combat
gear but sat calmly by his car instead.
The AR-15 is a semi-automatic version of the military M-16
rifle, first marketed for civilian sales in 1963.
Glock, an Austrian gunmaker, has become the leading seller
of semi-automatic pistols to U.S. law enforcement agencies and offers a variety
of .40-caliber pistols to civilians as well.
The Remington Model 870 is a U.S.-made pump-action shotgun
used by the public for sport shooting and hunting and is often carried by law
enforcement and military personnel.
What do you think of when you see that
image? I think of military special
forces or SWAT teams. Yet everything he
wore or was armed with was completely legal to purchase and possess in America.
In some places, such as Arizona, where unlicensed "open carry" is allowed, you can walk down the street dressed
and armed this way, and there's not a thing the police can do to stop
you.
Is this the cost of our "freedoms," as the NRA
defines them?
It's time to put a limit on what dangerous people are able
to buy in the United States. It's time
to re-instate the Assault Weapons Ban, prohibit high-capacity ammo clips, and
better regulate large sales of ammunition and weaponry.