On this one, we agree. Huntsman and Gingrich are the only Republicans who can speak intelligently without also sounding like a con artist. Thus, they won't be getting the nomination.
Newt is not nearly as brainy as he is reputed to be, and Huntsman is smart - very smart - but he is toeing the far rightwinger line, which won't win him the nomination, much less the general election.
What you don't include but should is Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico. He is one sharp, articulate, well educated clever and very successful conservative. Refreshingly, unlike the rest of the GOP candidate mob, he's also far more factually accurate in his statements.
Would you like me to print up some cards that declare me to be wrong? Or perhaps I should just insert that statement into all of my posts to save you some time. We could even add a tune to it.
You do get tiresome constantly repeating that line. Perhaps you'd like to defend your claim, rather than assert it, once in a while?
If Gingrich says it, in connection with anything that genuinely matters, it's more than likely wrong. We're talking about a guy who is so fucked up that his own party kicked him to the curb after making his Speaker of the House.
It's not just Libya, Cain's pretty much a moron, across the board. If there's a dumbass answer, Herman's got it ready to spew.
ReplyDeleteOn this one, we agree. Huntsman and Gingrich are the only Republicans who can speak intelligently without also sounding like a con artist. Thus, they won't be getting the nomination.
ReplyDeleteYou are wrong, again Greg.
ReplyDeleteNewt is not nearly as brainy as he is reputed to be, and Huntsman is smart - very smart - but he is toeing the far rightwinger line, which won't win him the nomination, much less the general election.
What you don't include but should is Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico. He is one sharp, articulate, well educated clever and very successful conservative. Refreshingly, unlike the rest of the GOP candidate mob, he's also far more factually accurate in his statements.
Dog Gone,
ReplyDeleteWould you like me to print up some cards that declare me to be wrong? Or perhaps I should just insert that statement into all of my posts to save you some time. We could even add a tune to it.
You do get tiresome constantly repeating that line. Perhaps you'd like to defend your claim, rather than assert it, once in a while?
dog gone:
ReplyDeleteAnd Gary Johnson has some baggage as well.
Newt's a sleaze and a charlatan. Of course the folks that flock to him need that sort of thing, 'cuz the truth scares the livin' shit out of them.
Greg Camp:
ReplyDeleteIt's a bit like the issue of lying. When you stop acting like an idiot, you'll stop being called an idiot.
GC wrote:
ReplyDeleteHuntsman and Gingrich are the only Republicans who can speak intelligently without also sounding like a con artist.
Do you listent to Gingrich at all GC?
He's a huckster, he's pure charlatan. Maybe the problem is you don't know the difference.
It's a whole lot easier to call someone a liar or a fool than to explain what's wrong with what he says.
ReplyDeleteIf Gingrich says it, in connection with anything that genuinely matters, it's more than likely wrong. We're talking about a guy who is so fucked up that his own party kicked him to the curb after making his Speaker of the House.
ReplyDelete