This is the story about which Fat White Man quipped, "Why are Lefties so violent."FBI officials said Thursday that the shooting of a security guard at the Family Research Council's D.C. headquarters on Wednesday may fall in the "hate crime/terrorism nexus," depending on the shooter's motive.FRC is a socially conservative Christian advocacy organization that opposes gay marriage and abortion, among its other causes. In an interview on Fox News Thursday, FRC President Tony Perkins said he thought the attack should be classified as "terrorism," but some other commentators have suggested that the shooting may also qualify as a hate crime, if it can be proven that the attacker was targeting the group's religious beliefs.
Suspected shooter Floyd Lee Corkins II "has strong opinions with respect to those he believes do not treat homosexuals in a fair manner," according to his parents, and Corkins is said to have yelled that he did not like FRC's politics before opening fire. He was also found with a backpack that contained more than a dozen Chick-Fil-a sandwiches.
Well, I guess on the surface that's a fair question. What do you think? Does this case prove that the lunatic gun maniacs are not limited to the Right side of the political spectrum? Or is this the exception that proves the rule?
There's no denying that by targeting a notorious right-wing organization one probably belongs to the Left, but what about those Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in his backpack? What could that be all about? It sounds to me like Floyd was just another mixed up gun owner.
No, I'm afraid it's not as simple as Left vs. Right. There are plenty of fanatical gun owners who hold certain "Lefty" ideals. Some of them feel sympathetic towards homosexual cases, I suppose some of them are gay themselves.
No, the distinction when it comes to gun ownership is not whether a person is left-leaning or right-leaning politically, but whether they are of sound mind and responsible. Guys who fail in those categories and believe the gun is the answer to whatever problem they have are a danger. And as much as the rest of the gun-loving community tries to deny it, they are too many.
What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.
"They" are too many? So you say, but so you consistently fail to demonstrate. We've shown you plenty of evidence to the contrary.
ReplyDeleteTo answer your question, though, his actions appear to qualify. To me, criminalizing motive is silly. Why he did what he did is a question for the police during their investigation, but the man has already been caught. The crime is no more or less heinous by virtue of the criminal's motive. Punish him for his bad act, but don't tell people what they must think or feel.
But DC has very strict gun control....oh yeah, more FAIL.
ReplyDeleteCorkins was an Occupy Wall Street supporter and a Democrat. Those types tend to be very violent.
But DC has very strict gun control....oh yeah, more FAIL.
ReplyDeleteCorkins was an Occupy Wall Street supporter and a Democrat. Those types tend to be very violent.