This is the beginning of the death of Gun Control. This was your best chance in 20 years, and you've failed. The tide has turned since '94. We now have better information, better communications, better organization, and growing numbers on our side.
Too bad for you. Your issue is dead--you just don't know it yet.
The tide has turned since 1994. Gun owners are more aware of your goals. We won't be fooled. You may post as many videos as you want from these control freak elitists who shake their heads in disbelief, but outside of leftist enclaves, gun control is a squib round. Did you post but ignore that graphic from the Wall Street Journal? Did you look at the link I gave you about police opinion? The evidence is out there, even if you refuse to see it.
I agree that the division is more defined than ever before. But what you refuse to admit is the gun-rights fanatics are a tiny fringe group of gun owners at large. That's why you keep citing the total number of gun owners because those of you who are passionate about this are few indeed.
You keep mentioning some class of individual to whom you refer as "gun-rights fanatics." Could you name one? I've never encountered one. I really cannot visualize how it would be possible for one to be a "fanatic" about rights.
The fact that many of us would sooner die (and yes--kill, as well) before surrendering our rights is not "fanaticism," of course. It's simply devotion to our duty to remain free.
Every day, we see more gun owners becoming more active--more involved in the struggle to protect our rights. We see that everyone is worried and buying ammo to such an extent that you can barely find it anymore. We see the growth of new gun cultures as people gather and organize online (e.g. the relatively new offshoot of organic locavores who have taken up hunting).
You and Scarborough can keep saying that people are changing in your direction, but repeating that line and repeating flawed polling results by biased pollsters does not make it so. In the '90s, you could get away with repeating such lies and convincing people, but now, in the age of the Internet, we can get our news and information without needing to go to authorized journalists.
Mikeb, you don't understand economics much, do you? If our numbers are as small as you claim, there's no way that we could affect the total supply of ammunition to the extent that shelves are empty.
Either we have a lot more money than you realize or there are a lot more of us than you are willing to admit. Either way, you might want to rethink your positions.
This is the beginning of the death of Gun Control. This was your best chance in 20 years, and you've failed. The tide has turned since '94. We now have better information, better communications, better organization, and growing numbers on our side.
ReplyDeleteToo bad for you. Your issue is dead--you just don't know it yet.
I don't know how you can say that. It's exactly the opposite, as Scarborough said in the video.
DeleteI guess I do know how you could say it. Your side has small acquaintance with the truth and often you're like little kids whistling in the dark.
The tide has turned since 1994. Gun owners are more aware of your goals. We won't be fooled. You may post as many videos as you want from these control freak elitists who shake their heads in disbelief, but outside of leftist enclaves, gun control is a squib round. Did you post but ignore that graphic from the Wall Street Journal? Did you look at the link I gave you about police opinion? The evidence is out there, even if you refuse to see it.
DeleteI agree that the division is more defined than ever before. But what you refuse to admit is the gun-rights fanatics are a tiny fringe group of gun owners at large. That's why you keep citing the total number of gun owners because those of you who are passionate about this are few indeed.
DeleteYou keep mentioning some class of individual to whom you refer as "gun-rights fanatics." Could you name one? I've never encountered one. I really cannot visualize how it would be possible for one to be a "fanatic" about rights.
DeleteThe fact that many of us would sooner die (and yes--kill, as well) before surrendering our rights is not "fanaticism," of course. It's simply devotion to our duty to remain free.
Every day, we see more gun owners becoming more active--more involved in the struggle to protect our rights. We see that everyone is worried and buying ammo to such an extent that you can barely find it anymore. We see the growth of new gun cultures as people gather and organize online (e.g. the relatively new offshoot of organic locavores who have taken up hunting).
DeleteYou and Scarborough can keep saying that people are changing in your direction, but repeating that line and repeating flawed polling results by biased pollsters does not make it so. In the '90s, you could get away with repeating such lies and convincing people, but now, in the age of the Internet, we can get our news and information without needing to go to authorized journalists.
"We see that everyone is worried and buying ammo to such an extent that you can barely find it anymore."
DeleteEveryone? Or just the gullible and paranoid minority who fall under the influence of the NRA and the gun manufacturers.
Mikeb, you don't understand economics much, do you? If our numbers are as small as you claim, there's no way that we could affect the total supply of ammunition to the extent that shelves are empty.
DeleteEither we have a lot more money than you realize or there are a lot more of us than you are willing to admit. Either way, you might want to rethink your positions.
How about you summarize these lengthy videos? I'm not going to waste time listening to a one-sided discussion of all the blather that your side spews.
ReplyDeleteI see Morning Joe has gone over to the dark side.
ReplyDeleteorlin sellers
They've been there forever.
DeleteMikeb, did you see the latest CNN poll? Fifty-two percent oppose Obama's efforts at gun control.
ReplyDeleteDon't rub salt into poor wittle Mikey's wounds he's gonna have to bite down on his Mayor Blomberg pillow and cry salty tears over that poll.....
DeleteI thought Bloomberg banned salt. ;)
Deleteorlin sellers
That too, right along with sugar. Fortunately, Columbians will soon be smuggling both in to needy New Yorkers.
DeleteIs there any sight more beautiful than anti-gun (and thus anti-freedom, thus anti-American, thus anti-human) hive insects devouring their own?
ReplyDeleteI'd be hard-pressed to think of one.
Evil. It just looks better when it's defeated and utterly destroyed.