Link provided by George Jefferson, who said this "Courage enough to talk about the real agenda of the anti's"
Back in May this year, Andrea Colledani wrote an article for The
Beacon suggesting that the Second Amendment needed to be revised to fit
modern needs. Unfortunately, she did not have any suggestion for what
course of action might be taken.
Colledani was right of course, the Second Amendment is outdated.
Militias are redundant in the modern developed world, but the right to
bear arms goes beyond that. The guns used at Lexington and Concord were
hunting rifles, and regardless of your participation in the sport, there
is no denying that its practice is beneficial. When deer populations
skyrocket, the creatures destroy crops worse than rats, and coyotes are
more violent pests. I realize that these are less of an issue in Miami
than in my native Iowa, but the U.S. is made of much more than South
Florida.
If I had my way, the solution to gun rights would be in your wallet. I
don’t believe anyone needs to own a gun. Some careers may benefit from
their use, but that’s on a professional level, not a personal one. If
you need a gun at work, you should pick up your sidearm when you punch
in and drop it off when you punch out. But what about the every man,
those hunters I spent my last paragraph defending? They wouldn’t own
their guns or their relatives. I say all ranged weapons – shotguns,
rifles, pistols and bows – need to be collected by the government,
catalogued and put in a library. You want to shoot Bambi? Fine, but I’ll
need to see your gun-library-card.
"silly solution"
ReplyDeleteSilly indeed. I have firearms AND a library card.
Gee, I thought "no one wants to take your guns."
ReplyDelete