Thursday, September 10, 2015

Oregon Man Charged for Trying to Kill Newspaper Carriers

Shad Gary Dunbar, Sept. 8, 2015 (Jackson County Sheriff's Office)
Shad Gary Dunbar

Local news reports

Authorities say a man has been arrested after allegedly chasing down two people who were delivering newspapers in Rogue River and shooting at them.

The Mail Tribune reports 34-year-old Shad Gary Dunbar is being held on attempted murder and other charges for allegedly firing at newspaper carriers, Linda Parker and Roger Price, Saturday.

Parker says they had just delivered a newspaper and drove off when they heard gunshots. Dunbar, who lived nearby, had allegedly got into his father’s car and started firing and chasing the victims.

20 comments:

  1. "Dunbar was lodged Monday in the Jackson County Jail by Rogue River police on two counts of attempted murder, four counts of reckless endangering, being a felon in possession of a weapon and unlawful use of a weapon, jail records show.
    Dunbar remained jailed Monday on more than $2 million bail."

    http://www.mailtribune.com/article/20150907/NEWS/150909705

    Uh, not so lawful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh, not so lawful.

      True, but Mikeb is superhumanly resistant to truth.

      Delete
    2. No, I just missed that. I'll change the tag so Kurt can get some sleep.

      Delete
  2. I wonder how it's so easy for these kooks to get guns?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right Anon, you would have thought that the universal background checks the state has adopted would have stopped him. Sorry, couldn't resist......

      Delete
    2. Guys like you SS that thwart the attempt to make these checks better.

      Delete
    3. Of course the gun control folks will ask for more gun control before the ink is even dry on the signature of the bill to ban private sales/loans. And because it will always be "easy" for free people to get legal and abundant things, they will perpetually be demanding more gun control.

      Delete
    4. As I said Anon, Oregon has the much vaunted universal background check law. Exactly what did I thwart in this case?

      Delete
    5. "Of course the gun control folks will ask for more gun control "

      Well, I certainly will. Mandatory safe storage would prevent hundreds of thousands of guns from being stolen from you irresponsible but legal gun owners. That would be a good place to start.

      Delete
    6. Of course the gun control folks will ask for more gun control

      So we tell them, "No." Then we laugh, and laugh.

      Delete
    7. MikeB: "That would be a good place to start."

      Of course. So "Mandatory Safe Storage" becomes "Mandatory Government Storage" after you figure out that it is not working so well.

      My overall message is that you guys use the inevitable failure of gun control as a reason to demand more gun control.

      Delete
    8. You won't allow these gun laws to work properly by supporting loop holes and not giving them enough time to work.
      Did I say this case? Thought not, next lie...............

      Delete
    9. Well Anon, I didn't have anything to do with Oregon's new law. Exactly how long should a law be given to work before you get to decide it doesn't?

      Delete
    10. "My overall message is that you guys use the inevitable failure of gun control as a reason to demand more gun control."

      That might make sense if we'd ever had proper gun control and it failed. The truth is we haven't tried it yet.

      Delete
    11. Ah, so you are back to conceding that gun control hasn't worked (so far). When you said "I haven't shown you shit" yesterday it was just another one of your daily oscillations on this topic. Tomorrow will be a new day as well, I'm sure.

      Delete
    12. And I have to wonder why you keep asking for the same things over and over when you admit that it hasn't worked in the past. In this case, we are specifically talking about state level bans on private sales/loans. Yet you want more and more. Actually, I don't have to wonder. I know why you want more of this, and it doesn't have anything to do with saving lives.

      Delete
    13. " it hasn't worked in the past."

      Oh, yeah, when we tried private sale background checks and mandatory safe storage, it just didn't work? Is that your position?

      Delete
    14. Several states have banned private transfers, to such an extreme degree that even you say that parts of it should not be enforced. It hasn't worked, yet you call for more states to do the same (including the parts that you call too extreme to be enforced).

      It's true that no place in the US has ever tried what you call "safe storage", but they have in Australia, and it didn't work there. And guess what- Rebecca Peters now demands even stricter guidelines for storage.

      Delete
    15. When the gun loon stance is it's unconstitutional to go beyond the stated period, yet, that time was not enough to find the facts, that's thwarting the idea of the law, and it's typical of you to just let those sales go ahead, since you could care less about the innocent people killed. Next BS SS.........

      Delete