Here's a better look at her on the video.
Poor sad girl who couldn't deal well with relationships, but knew all about guns. In Montana, the gun is the answer.
What's your opinion? Do you think it's a stretch for me to blame gun availability and the gun-friendly environment of Montana? I don't think so.
My idea is that access to guns should be controlled, strictly controlled. The result would be that some of these cases would be less damaging. Who really believes that Michelle would have killed her ex with something other than a gun?
What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.
Isn't the very definition of a crime of passion, as this presumably was, that it is a decision made on the basis of emotion rather than reason?
ReplyDeleteGuns were not the only factor here, but clearly the availability and the ease of use were significant.
She might have killed her ex with something other than a gun, but certainly a gun made it easier, and typically a firearm is more often a weapon of impulse.
Damn straight it made it easier. The pro gun argument that there would be as many murders or suicides without guns is one of their stupidest.
ReplyDelete