I know, I know, this has nothing to do with the lawful gun owners and the gun-rights movement, or does it?
For one thing the proliferation of guns among the drug dealers and home invaders in Providence is directly related to the legitimate side of gun ownership. That where the guns come from.
For another, this interesting case begs the question, was this a legitimate DGU? Just because the guy protecting his home was a criminal doesn't change that fact, does it?
And what about the neighbor who has a dog for protection? That says something about the "need" for guns, don't you think?
Please leave a comment.