Given the minimal training and requirements required for gun ownership, even in the strictest states, it makes perfect sense that local law enforcement should be involved.Yesterday U.S. District Court Judge Morrison England in Sacramento, CA ruled that Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto indeed had the right to choose who qualifies for conceal carry gun permits. The judge explained there was nothing unlawful about requesting applicants to prove they have a reasonable need to carry a weapon outside their home.
California continues to be the leader.
What's your opinion? Please leave a comment.
The judge explained there was nothing unlawful about requesting applicants to prove they have a reasonable need to carry a weapon outside their home.
ReplyDeleteIn the past, you have explained your support for may-issue so local law enforcement can make denials based on character. This however shows that upstanding characters are routinely denied not because they are unfit or untrained, but because those with the power to deny- say “you have no need”. This is what happens with may-issue policy. One with a spotless background could demonstrate superior proficiency and provide proof of a death threat and still be denied.
I don't think it works like that, TS. If the applicant is worried about a death threat, the approval would be swift and sure. That's the best reason going.
ReplyDeleteYou're presuming ill-will on the part of the local law enforcement.