America, relishing in it's military omnipotence, has such a powerful world presence that it fails to realize that the real enemy is within. There have been so many restriction that have been erroneously placed on State interests that the current system has created a State grossly incapable of defending the most fundamental human right: life.
The current system illustrates the backwards notion that mere persons (as opposed to the collective State) are (somehow) endowed with "rights" (such as the right to hate, the right to evade law enforcement, the right to own killing machines, and the like) and that, upon the formation of a collective society, and a State to rule over such, subjects grant necessary power to the State in order for such to fulfill specific duties. Such a concept of "limited State power" is a socially perverse notion, of unlimited destruction.
I define life as consciousness. Brain activity. It is a trivialization of life itself to refer to a community of undifferentiated cells as "human life". When you can differentiate a human zygote from that of a rat, then I may consider it to be life worthy of State protection.
"When you can differentiate a human zygote from that of a rat, then I may consider it to be life worthy of State protection."
Ask any scientist and they can easily point to the differences between a human zygote and a rat. The genetics are quite clear that a human zygote is a unique human individual separate from both his/her mother and father.
The worst kind of hypocrite is the one who preaches his opinions about abortion being murder all the while supporting capital punishment and the castle doctrine.
America, relishing in it's military omnipotence, has such a powerful world presence that it fails to realize that the real enemy is within. There have been so many restriction that have been erroneously placed on State interests that the current system has created a State grossly incapable of defending the most fundamental human right: life.
ReplyDeleteThe current system illustrates the backwards notion that mere persons (as opposed to the collective State) are (somehow) endowed with "rights" (such as the right to hate, the right to evade law enforcement, the right to own killing machines, and the like) and that, upon the formation of a collective society, and a State to rule over such, subjects grant necessary power to the State in order for such to fulfill specific duties. Such a concept of "limited State power" is a socially perverse notion, of unlimited destruction.
State interests that the current system has created a State grossly incapable of defending the most fundamental human right: life.
ReplyDeleteSo you are an anti-abortionist..... glad to have you in the ranks....
I define life as consciousness. Brain activity. It is a trivialization of life itself to refer to a community of undifferentiated cells as "human life". When you can differentiate a human zygote from that of a rat, then I may consider it to be life worthy of State protection.
Delete"When you can differentiate a human zygote from that of a rat, then I may consider it to be life worthy of State protection."
DeleteAsk any scientist and they can easily point to the differences between a human zygote and a rat. The genetics are quite clear that a human zygote is a unique human individual separate from both his/her mother and father.
Men should shut the fuck up about women's rights. They're opinions on when abortions should be allowed are a joke.
DeleteThe same way that people who don't own guns should shut up about the rights of gun owners?
DeleteState interests that the current system has created a State grossly incapable of defending the most fundamental human right: life.
ReplyDeleteSo you are an anti-abortionist..... glad to have you in the ranks....
The worst kind of hypocrite is the one who preaches his opinions about abortion being murder all the while supporting capital punishment and the castle doctrine.
Delete