In his recent book Presidential Perks Gone Royal, Robert Keith Gray, a former Eisenhower staffer, revealed that last year the U.S. presidency cost American taxpayers $1.4 billion. Over the same period, the entire royal family cost British taxpayers about $57 million. There’s nothing “royal” about the current level of “presidential perks”: The Obama family costs taxpayers more than every European royal house put together.
btw, it is sad and pitiful to see mikeb have to resort to going to the Facebook junkyard of placards at Penigma to find something to blog about.
Yep, everything in America was Super Duper Swell until President Kenyan Marxist Usurper got into the White House!!!
The British Royal family "owns" vast holdings throughout the UK. And how did they get these holdings? why at various times in History they slaughtered the inhabitants and took the land, including famously the beheading of Thomas More and the confiscation of "his" lands for Elizabeth the First, which are still owned by the Crown today.
Of course, orlin is a bigot because how Dare Obama occupy the White House with his fancy guards and tuxedoes!!!
Of course, he has but the Rich ordered their paid for Republican Hit Men and their Conservative Think Tanks and Toxic Right-Wing Media Empires to blame the other, President Black Black Black, for all the Nation's woes and Conservatives being natural Racist Bigots easily believed Obama was too blame for all the Nation's Woes.
This is going to be the mission of the Heritage Fund, Faux News, Racist Limbaugh and every other Right-Wing Lie Factory for the next 50 years. It'll be a non-stop Blame Barack Campaign.
Talk about lying with statistics. Those numbers represent percent growth in spending, not dollars spent. W. increased Federal spending, but Obama hasn't reduced it.
Only the truth. Look at the title of that image: smallest government spender. Obama is the biggest spender. At no point do we see a reduction in spending by either party. That being the case, even if Obama allowed no increase, he'd still be spending at the highest level left to him by Bush. But he increased spending--by a lower rate, if we're to believe the numbers, but that still an increase. Therefore, Obama is the biggest spender.
In his recent book Presidential Perks Gone Royal, Robert Keith Gray, a former Eisenhower staffer, revealed that last year the U.S. presidency cost American taxpayers $1.4 billion. Over the same period, the entire royal family cost British taxpayers about $57 million. There’s nothing “royal” about the current level of “presidential perks”: The Obama family costs taxpayers more than every European royal house put together.
ReplyDeletebtw, it is sad and pitiful to see mikeb have to resort to going to the Facebook junkyard of placards at Penigma to find something to blog about.
orlin sellers
Yep, everything in America was Super Duper Swell until President Kenyan Marxist Usurper got into the White House!!!
DeleteThe British Royal family "owns" vast holdings throughout the UK. And how did they get these holdings? why at various times in History they slaughtered the inhabitants and took the land, including famously the beheading of Thomas More and the confiscation of "his" lands for Elizabeth the First, which are still owned by the Crown today.
Of course, orlin is a bigot because how Dare Obama occupy the White House with his fancy guards and tuxedoes!!!
You say it like bigotry is a bad thing.
Deleteorlin sellers
Of course, he has but the Rich ordered their paid for Republican Hit Men and their Conservative Think Tanks and Toxic Right-Wing Media Empires to blame the other, President Black Black Black, for all the Nation's woes and Conservatives being natural Racist Bigots easily believed Obama was too blame for all the Nation's Woes.
ReplyDeleteThis is going to be the mission of the Heritage Fund, Faux News, Racist Limbaugh and every other Right-Wing Lie Factory for the next 50 years. It'll be a non-stop Blame Barack Campaign.
Talk about lying with statistics. Those numbers represent percent growth in spending, not dollars spent. W. increased Federal spending, but Obama hasn't reduced it.
ReplyDeleteWhatever they represent, isn't it clear the difference between Republicans and Democrats? Are you totally incapable of admitting anything?
DeleteOnly the truth. Look at the title of that image: smallest government spender. Obama is the biggest spender. At no point do we see a reduction in spending by either party. That being the case, even if Obama allowed no increase, he'd still be spending at the highest level left to him by Bush. But he increased spending--by a lower rate, if we're to believe the numbers, but that still an increase. Therefore, Obama is the biggest spender.
DeleteMikeb, specify the major differences between Rs & Ds. You can't.
Deleteorlin sellers
What is that that Judge Judy sez,"Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining."
ReplyDeleteorlin sellers