 |
| NRA "Special" Forces |
Wolverines!!!!
Seriously, this kind of talk is no different than what you might hear from a drunk at the end of the bar. I can whip Mike Tyson or I could bat .300 in the majors--switch-hitting.
What our gunloons--and the drunk at the end of the bar--know is that they'll never have the chance. It's always easy to talk big when you fully understand you'll never get the opportunity.
You have no clue.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you understand what the fight would entail exactly, and what the motives would be. You've just boiled it down to a cage match.
ReplyDeleteI saw this photo WAY too close to lunch. I laughed, a lot - but I am afraid it also made me gag a bit.
ReplyDeleteClearly, a true fetishist.
Is this the same guy from the earlier photo, posed on his bed in some sort of itty bitty g-strin with his ........guns and not much else? (Apparently in his mother's basement)
To answer the question in the title... oh, HELL no!
and
http://penigma.blogspot.com/2011/02/2nd-amendment-justification-is-violent.html
NRA 'special' forces?
ReplyDeleteROFL, not special in a flattering sense of the word.
TS said, in all seriousness, "I don't think you understand what the fight would entail exactly."
ReplyDeleteTS, there is going to be NO fight. That's number 1. And if there were, the government would win and the gun owners would lose, period.
MikeB: “there is going to be NO fight. That's number 1.”
ReplyDeleteAgreed.
MikeB: “And if there were, the government would win and the gun owners would lose, period.”
Why couldn’t we win in Vietnam? And when we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan, the insurgents and Taliban will still be there. Mark my words.
What I was asking Jade was the specifics of the fight. What are the orders of the US Military? Is it to kill every man woman and child, bomb/nuke/level every city in the USA? Is it to round up and kill everyone who owns a gun? Or is it to squash only those who would oppose them? Are you starting to see the difficulties of a government trying to fight a resistance interspersed among its people? It is not as simple as the entire US military on one side of a field, and the American gun owning population standing on the other side of a line.
Dig gone: “Is this the same guy from the earlier photo, posed on his bed in some sort of itty bitty g-strin with his ........guns and not much else? (Apparently in his mother's basement)”
ReplyDeleteThe same. It is at least the third time Jade has used this guy. Since he is supposed to represent Jade’s typical gunloon, you would think he wouldn’t have to use the same guy over and over.
That picture made me laugh pretty hard, I have to admit!!
ReplyDeleteI don't want him in my foxhole.
Let's see, times the US Military has been used against it's people?
Miners strikes before 1950, 3 or 4 times. The city of angels in the riots. Once.
Mobilized on and around 9/11.
I really think the US soldiers would have issues with battling their own countrymen. BUT, I agree, if the battle was the entire US military and all it's might, versus some gun owners, we lose. But this game will never be played because the people rule.
It's the pro-gun crowd that keeps referring to this ridiculous scenario. You guys, the ones of you who keep referring to this, are nuts. There's my name for it, grandiose paranioa, or you could pick another.
ReplyDeleteMike. Stay in Italy. You've lost the balls to be an American
ReplyDeleteMike, thank you for showing us your courage, in opposition to extreme ideology, in contrast to say flashing us your testicles or other naked parts like the guy in the photo.
ReplyDeleteTo jade's credit - there have been multiple photos, even if it is the same guy....and I think he's hilarious every time (so, thanks Jade!)
This is NOT the only guy like this out there.
Yeah, right P, I don't have the balls to stand up for my rights against the tyrannical government.
ReplyDeleteOr, maybe there is no tyrannical government in the US and you're a complete nut.
Or, you agree with me that there's no tyrannical government but you just pretend there is as a justification for what Dog Gone calls your gun fetish.
Take you pick.