Sunday, January 26, 2014

In case you haven't figured it out...

I tend to write posts before I post them.  Often, when MikeB asks me to fill in for him, I can write posts days ahead of when they will post (as is the case with this one).

I am also "comment adverse" meaning that I usually don't bother reading comments.  In fact, if moderation were on, no comments would be published during my tenure as "blogger in charge".

Very rarely do I actually read a comment (although, I do if it is something I need help on on my own blog).  but I really do tend to block people who annoy me--even if they "agree" with my point of view.  I am less concerned whether we agree or not as much as how annoying you happen to be.

Verstaste?

12 comments:

  1. If you prefer talking to yourself, why bother posting at all?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no difference between you two. You are both besotted with yourselves.

      orlin sellers

      Delete
    2. If you post nothing but lies and promoting criminality, why post at all.
      Back to teaching the ranked worst students in the country, lying criminal coward.

      Delete
  2. Fortunately mike understood this and turned off moderation off so you wouldn't need to worry about it....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Laci is far too busy measuring his penis and fantasizing about holding it next to others in a G.I. Joe double fist power grip.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This could be in response to my question about the Miller case. I've also asked it during periods where Laci was particularly chatty in the comment section, and still get nothing- like around that time he had three long winded angry posts in a row directed at Tennessean about how he doesn't have time to answer his inane questions (a classic moment in MikeB blog history).

    I can't blame him for not answering though. Given how much time he has spent blathering about how the second amendment right requires enrollment in the militia-and citing the Miller decision to support that- how do you address the fact that the court never looked at whether or not Miller was enrolled in the militia?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Laci, thanks for keeping the blog alive during my absence. I don't blame you one bit for not commenting. As I often say in defense of the other gun-control bloggers who've made the same decision, not everyone has the patience and time to deal with the highly tedious and frustrating brand of gun-rights commenters we seem to attract. I think I also have a smattering of masochism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We offer a spirited debate, to be sure, but we give good reasons for our positions. That's what gun control advocates find tedious, since we don't play here on the level of stereotypes.

      Delete
    2. The site lying criminal coward offers lies, that has been proven over and over again.

      Delete
    3. Proven how exactly?

      Delete
    4. By your own words, asshole lying criminal coward.
      No better proof.

      Delete
  6. Laci has been arguing with gun rights advocates since the days of Usenet. He loves it. Don't let the act fool you.

    Welcome back. I hope you had a good trip, Mike.

    ReplyDelete