Monday, December 8, 2014

Bill Maher on Militarization of the Police

30 comments:

  1. BUT BUT BUT...OFFICER SAFETY!



    MBIAC........

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was with him right up until he starts in with "where are the conservatives and Tea Party members?" as if he's the first one to say something about this. Go home, Bill. You're stoned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To answer your question, Bill, this is where the conservatives and libertarians are- ahead of you on the issue:

    http://time.com/3111474/rand-paul-ferguson-police/

    http://reason.com/tags/militarization-of-police

    http://www.redstate.com/2014/08/16/militarization-police-just-equipment/

    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0823/Pentagon-struggles-to-defend-militarization-of-police-forces-video

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/3/andrew-napolitano-ferguson-riots-failures-of-racia/

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/the-boston-defense

    http://www.cato.org/events/rise-warrior-cop-militarization-americas-police-forces

    http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/militarization-of-police-continues-surge/

    The thing is there are plenty of complaints about police militarization from liberal sources as well. But Bill Maher doesn’t seem to be interested in recognizing common agreement on an issue, and would rather just fight about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think he remark about the Tea Party was the most salient part of the discourse. Do you?

      Delete
    2. Why throw that in there when it's obvious that he's wrong that there aren't concerns coming from the right on this topic? It shows his mentality. He's a homer first and foremost- not even able to recognize opportunities to work together on areas of common ground.

      Delete
    3. That's funny TS. The Republicans can't even vote yes on bills they voted yes on before Obama was elected.

      Delete
    4. Homer (from Urban Dictionary):

      Someone who shows blind loyalty to a team or organization, typically ignoring any shortcomings or faults they have.

      Delete
  4. Bill is correct as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder what hilarious thing Maher could come up with about the sniper shot that took out Randy Weaver's wife or the innocent women and children gassed to death at WACO.
    Some of us were talking about jack-booted thuggery back then. Where was Bill?

    orlin sellers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill has been talking about it for a long time. Where have you been?

      Delete
    2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdY8GTl76-Q
      He was laughing about it, laughing about a man having his wife, son, and family pet killed.

      orlin sellers

      Delete
    3. Breaking news idiot, Bill is a comedian.

      Delete
  6. Holy cow, a video from over 20 years ago that has nothing to do with this issue proves Bill was not talking about the militarization of the police? You are more dishonest than SS, but Mike told me that a long time ago. Try again bozo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Holy cow is right. The guy who said, "Bill has been talking about it for a long time." is now complaining about a 20 year old video of Bill laughing about jack-booted thuggish snipers shooting a woman's head off.

      I apologize, I really shouldn't be feeding this troll.

      orlin sellers

      Delete
    2. Bill has been talking about this issue for years, but you keep the lies coming, I would be shocked if you stopped lying.

      Delete
    3. You a perfect example of a SUPERCILIOUS individual combined with a touch of Paranoid Schizophrenia. A big problem for an elitist such as you Anon. It really shows, go get help before the world collapses on you.

      Delete
    4. YOU don't know what the hell you are talking about anytime, so you revert to the language of idiots and being an idiot you think that means something. What a fucking joke you are.

      Delete
    5. Just keep on making my point.

      Delete
    6. As a typical swearing asshole, you keep making my point, and thanks for that.

      Delete
    7. That's right, let all out, you will feel better afterward. Keep letting in out, keep on swearing at me, I have big shoulders. Maybe I can help you feel better by letting you finally get rid of all that hate.

      Come on, keep going. And just keep proving my point.

      Delete
    8. As I have said many times, I respond in kind, so you keep swearing, that's what you get in return and deserve no better. Good luck with your strategy of being a foul mouthed asshole.

      Delete
    9. Anons, please give yourselves names.

      Delete
    10. Me swear? Where. No comment of mine has a single swear word but you let them pour out. So keep going, let all that hate out and you will feel better later.

      Come on, keep going. And just keep proving my point.

      Delete
    11. Mike, as soon as its required, no anon option, I will provide a name.

      But with that said, what will keep someone from continuing to change that name and confusing things even more?

      Your one anti-anon continues to spew hate and accuse me and others of foul language when none have been used. But he has no problem of using the foul language the he accuses me of. Just read above, where is a singe swear word found besides his? Or just resort to calling other liars without any proof of any lie to be found.

      Names are one thing Mike, name calling and swearing is another. Do you support this kind of attitude Mike?

      " What a fucking joke you are."
      " As a typical swearing asshole, you keep making my point, and thanks for that. "
      "Good luck with your strategy of being a foul mouthed asshole. "

      This is but a microscopic example of responses of his but nowhere will you find that I have used any such language. And anti-anon's examples really do bring the standards of blogging down on your site.

      So yeah, I do understand your call for everyone to use a name or even a "handle", but call for a little respect to be used on your blog as well Mike. It wont look like your scraping the bottom of the barrel for support for your side.

      Delete
    12. "when none have been used"
      What a fucking liar, but I have proven that so many times it's getting boring.

      Delete
    13. And you just continue to make my point.

      Delete
    14. "but nowhere will you find that I have used any such language"

      How am I supposed to know which anonymous is the good one and which is the bad one? Name yourself.

      Delete
    15. As I said above Mike, and I will kindly do so. But its not so hard to read above and see who is who. The bad one is the one using swear words in every comment, the good one is not. Its not that hard.

      But I still don't see you calling for a little respect to be shown on your blog Mike, or do you really enjoy scraping the bottom of the barrel.

      Delete
    16. As usually dishonest you didn't quote yourself swearing at me which is why I replied with swearing. As I have said many times, I respond in kind, you deserve nothing better. Next lie liar>>>>>>>>

      Delete