Sunday, February 12, 2012

Humor in the Push Back Against the Right Wing Culture War on Women

Apparently we have returned to those glorious days of yesteryear, as old-timey radio used to say.



And we have George Carlin's riff on the War on Women, that right wing attempt to keep us barefoot, and pregnant, and in our place, the one that wants to weaken the description of rape, the one that wants to repeal equal pay for equal work laws, the one that wants to make it more difficult and costly to control our reproductive rights.


There is a great deal to be said for the push-back against right wing reactionary politics using humor.

We have the Virginia state senator, Janet Howell who tried to amend legislation that would force costly, non-medical procedures on a woman by linking a similar measure that would force men who wanted erectile dysfunction medication to get a rectal exam.  Actually, that makes sense, because of the typical age of men who actually need, rather than simply want for recreational purposes, that kind of medication and prostate cancer and other diseases.  Lets call out the hypocrisy of the pro-freedom from government intrusion crowd for what they are, liars and hypocrites for interfering with medical care and legal procedures to force their religious beliefs on the rest of us.

Now we have another female state senator who has beautifully used humor again in a similar way.  Constance Johnson, a state senator in the Oklahoma legislature, addressed the insanity of trying to give equal personhood to zygotes at the instant of conception.  As a point against the legislative attempt by the right to wrongly redefine personhood, I would point out that we don't and cannot ever determine the moment of conception.  I could write here at some length about the process known as spermatozoon activation or the acrosomal reaction, because I actually read about things like this extensively in pursuing my interest in theriogenology.  But this blog is about politics and current events (and anything else we feel like writing about) so I will save my other hobbies for a different niche.  The point is -we don't know, and with the exception of some very specific kinds of artificial insemination, NEVER know in the natural course of things, when the moment of conception occurs.  It takes us a while to be able to tell THAT it occurs, and that requires separate processes, including uterine implantation.  So on the face of it, the very premise of this legislation is poor.  But Howell does tie in to the obvious attempt to force on the rest of us, in a violation of church and state, one of the premises of the catholic church, that masturbation is a mortal sin.
Sperm-egg.jpg
I agree with my high school biology teacher, who gave us the most comprehensive sex ed classes imaginable; 95% of men admit to masturbation, and the other 5% are liars.  I would posit that the numbers for women are similar.

7 comments:

  1. "Actually, that makes sense, because of the typical age of men who actually need, rather than simply want for recreational purposes, that kind of medication and prostate cancer and other diseases."

    I don't know one single man that needs or wants prostate cancer and other diseases for recreational purposes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dang, FatWhiteMan, you're reminding me of the 80s, and now I've got Guns and Roses playing in my head.

      "If you got the money, honey, we got your disease. . ."

      Delete
  2. Not only is every zygote a person, but as a person, it has the natural right to firearms, and gun manufacturers are missing out on a fine new market here. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. //95% of men admit to masturbation, and the other 5% are liars//

    You calling the Pope a liar? hehehe ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. okjimm, are you saying the Pope is among the 5% who claims never to have masturbated? If so, then yes.

    Otherwise he is simply supporting a system that 98% of his own religion don't support, which is to make something sexual a sin that isn't a sin, be it either masturbation or contraception. The only reason for this to be a papal position is they're short of new Catholics; always has been, along with a poor understanding of science originally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sin isn't defined by consensus, Dog Gone, despite your view of the world. The Church defines within its own context what is and what is not a sin. You're free to disagree, but you'd be heterodox for doing so, and good for you.

      Delete