arma virumque cano (et alia)
The difference between him and us is that we're not politicians capable of affecting national policy. Also, we're not embroiled in a scandal where hundreds to thousands of people died due to a controversial gun running operation cooked up by him or his people. The type of operation, had it been kept secret, would have helped in the brainwashing efforts he talked about in the video.
"hundreds to thousands of people died due to a controversial gun running operation cooked up by him or his people."Now they're responsible for the whole thing?
"Now they're responsible for the whole thing?"They purposefully gave weapons to cartel members without any way of tracking them. Those guns were then used to kill hundreds to potentially thousands of Mexicans. Hell yes they are responsible for every one of those deaths.
My mistake, I thought you said hundreds OF thousands. Now I getcha.
We're also not trying to take away anyone's rights. We're just trying to go about our business. That's the difference between people who believe in freedom and people who seek to control everything.
How many people is Holder responsible for killing? It started at Ruby Ridge, then Waco. He is nothing but a professional pimp.orlin sellers
Get real, Orlin. You usually make more sense than that.
Mikeb, I'll excuse your comment simply because I believe you aren't well informed on Holder, PATCON, R.M. Schneiderman, the WACO & OKC coverup, and Holder's penchant for perjury that goes back decades.orlin sellers
Calling open carry an attempt at brainwashing is dishonest. Brainwashing isn't done out in the open. Brainwashing is a deceptive practice and involves force. Open carry, by contrast, is open. It may be a political statement, or it may just be an act of convenience, but no one is being forced into believing anything.
Loosen up a bit and call it "conditioning." It's the same damn thing. How many times have we heard the open carry monkeys talk about making guns so commonplace that people stop fearing them.
Open carry monkeys? Language like that is O.K. when it's directed against a group that isn't in favor right now, I suppose. But the difference here is that we're not trying to deceive anyone. We're just going about our business. (I don't carry openly, but I do advocate carrying, so I include myself in this.) Holder's proposals were sinister. Add to that the fact of Dumb and Spurious, and we have a pattern.