American Terrorist Wayne LaPierre: "This is it. We're down to the wire. It's now or never, victory or defeat. The time for talking is over. On Election Day, Nov. 6 -- only a month from now -- Americans will vote either to defend or surrender freedom in the most consequential national decision in U.S. history."
Oh well.
But we all know ol' terrorist Wayne will be grifting from the clueless next week.
Well, while I see Wayne being melodramatic, how exactly does he qualify as a 'terrorist'?
ReplyDeleteA terrorist who seeks to arm the populace of a nation, and further death and anarchy. LaPiearre seeks to deprive citizens of their fundamental rights to disarmament and subjugation.
DeleteWhat a better manner in which to commit ideological terrorism than to arm the American people with dangerous and radical notions of "individual rights" and "freedom".
I think it's because of his remarks along the lines of "those who own the guns make the rules."
DeleteE.N., you're insane, or you're a troll, or you're an agent for a foreign power--those aren't mutually exclusive. Regardless, your ideas are antithetical to American values. You're welcome to them, but don't be surprised when you can't get any support in this country.
ReplyDeleteWhat ideas of mine do you find to be contrary to (what you perceive as) "American values"?
DeleteGreg,
DeleteHe has to be a troll and he just proved it by asking you to restate which of the endless barrage of anti-american ideas he continually espouses.
The more E.N. talks, the more ridiculous his side looks.
DeleteThe reason I state the (admittedly overzealous) comments which I post, is necessary to provoke your own radicalism. It is only when I express fondness for "tyranny" that you expose your anti-government agenda.
DeleteI'm not anti-government. I'm opposed to tyranny. There's a difference, and here in America, we value that difference.
DeleteI like Alan. It is refreshing to see someone who is pro gun control call out some of the things that are said by Jadegold and EN.
ReplyDeleteJadegold can seem rather silly at times. What exactly (besides me playing off of Greg's paranoia) do you find to be alarming and worthy of "calling out"?
DeleteWell for one thing Bannerman, there is the whole multiple personality thing. That's a little alarming. Or the fact that you pretend to reside in a country that you actually do not. Or perhaps some of your questionable stories that you posted circa 1999. Those are definitely alarming.
DeleteIt is worth calling out your statist views.
DeleteHowever, on two occasions in this thread you are saying that you have been joking, by “playing off Greg’s paranoia” and “expressing a fondness for tyranny”. Fine, but I am not sure what you gain from baiting Greg into exposing anti-tyrannical government views. It would be like me baiting Mike into saying he wants me disarmed by my repeating how I much I want to kill a bunch of people on his blog- and then calling him a “gun grabber”. So you were being radical in order to provoke radicalism. How clever.
Honestly, I haven’t taken you seriously- and I don’t mean that as an insult, but rather that you come off as playing a character (which you are seemingly admitting to now).
"E.N" or Laci (depending on what personality is in control) is a rather irrelevant crackpot who deserves to be boxed up and stamped "return to sender" before being shipped back to the DPRK (North Korea) of wherever he is from.
DeleteHowever, I believe he does reflect the unspoken desire of anit-firearm statists to impose their ideals upon us "mere peasants" in order to compensate for one's own inadequacy. Since they cannot control themselves, they seek to regulate the behavior of others.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete