He's for small government, keeping government out of our private lives. I agree. He does have this one glaring contradiction on gun rights, but we all have our flaws. But he is arguing for the kind of Republican Party that I'd belong to.
I think he would agree with you on gun "rights". He has argued in favor of the ridiculous notion of an individual "right to keep and bear arms". The downfall of the GOP is the adherence to the backwards and dangerous concept of individual liberty.
E.N., we've seen video after video here showing Uygur arguing against an individual right to arms.
But seriously, the "backwards and dangerous concept of individual liberty"? That's the founding principle of this nation. That's the direction that modern societies head. You're the one who's caught in a dangerous ideology.
Not one word about cutting spending. He's just another idiot that thinks there's a difference between Rs & Ds. What this country needs is a second party.
He's for small government, keeping government out of our private lives. I agree. He does have this one glaring contradiction on gun rights, but we all have our flaws. But he is arguing for the kind of Republican Party that I'd belong to.
ReplyDeleteI think he would agree with you on gun "rights". He has argued in favor of the ridiculous notion of an individual "right to keep and bear arms". The downfall of the GOP is the adherence to the backwards and dangerous concept of individual liberty.
DeleteE.N., we've seen video after video here showing Uygur arguing against an individual right to arms.
DeleteBut seriously, the "backwards and dangerous concept of individual liberty"? That's the founding principle of this nation. That's the direction that modern societies head. You're the one who's caught in a dangerous ideology.
Not one word about cutting spending. He's just another idiot that thinks there's a difference between Rs & Ds. What this country needs is a second party.
ReplyDeleteorlin sellers
Orlin, I'm starting to think they're all idiots to you.
Delete