Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Women and Gay Gunloons Played for Chumps

Gunloons, like the GOP, like to pretend they're far more diverse than they are.  That's when the gunloons find the rara avis that is a gay or woman gunloon, they publicize the gunloon far and wide.

Well, female and gay gunloons, the gunloon's favorite gunloon Supreme Court Justice, Fat Tony Scalia says the Bill of Rights doesn't protect women or gays from discrimination.

Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn't. Nobody ever thought that that's what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that. If the current society wants to outlaw discrimination by sex, hey we have things called legislatures, and they enact things called laws. You don't need a constitution to keep things up-to-date. All you need is a legislature and a ballot box.
Posted by at

6 comments:

  1. Laci the Chinese CrestedJanuary 5, 2011 at 3:42 AM

    WTF! He's just making it up as he goes along.

    The only thing original in his interpretation of the Constitution is his unique ideas of how it should be interpreted.

    SO, inconvenient language can be ignored.

    I can't wait until he realises that Catholics don't have rights since most of the Founders were protestants!

    ReplyDelete
  2. FatWhiteManJanuary 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM

    Laci, please educate us. Which one of the amendments in the Bill of Rights prohibits discrimination based solely on sex?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Laci the Chinese CrestedJanuary 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM

    Sex as in gender, or sex as in sexual proclivity?

    Anyway: Here it is for you FWM:
    14th Amendment:

    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Got that All persons!

    It's like it's "a right of the people".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Laci the Chinese CrestedJanuary 5, 2011 at 5:04 PM

    Oh, and unlike the Second Amendment, there is no restrictive language as in:

    "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State,"

    The 14th Amendment is pretty much inclusive with it applying to "all persons" who are citizens of the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  5. FatWhiteManJanuary 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM

    Laci, I know you are a superlawyer and all, but the 14th amendment isn't part of the Bill of Rights. Care to try again?

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownJanuary 6, 2011 at 8:24 AM

    Yeah, Scalia's got to go. How old is that guy anyway? What's his health like?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)