I can see why the gun nuts embrace their wackier brother gun nuts. It probably makes them feel superior about their own fetish delusions.
But isn't it just typical that it would be in gun nut paradise, Florida?
From the Huff Post Weird News:
Mark Loescher, Assault Suspect, Tells Police He's Half-Orangutan And Elvis's Brother
If the police officers who arrested Mark Loescher for assault didn't think he was slightly bananas at first, it's possible they changed their minds when he allegedly told them he was half orangutan.
Florida police also say Loescher told them he was also Elvis Presley's brother, a friend of President Bush, and director of the CIA.
Deputies confronted Loescher in Naples, Fla., last week after after a woman said he had threatened her with a gun, Newser.com reported.
When the deputies got to the bank shortly before 5 p.m., they found Loescher still sitting in the driver’s seat while another woman, not the one who called the police, sat in the front passenger seat, according to the Naples Daily News.
The paper also reports that Loescher allegedly told police that he needed to call the "Fusion Center" about his monkey blood.
Once again, if you can tell me how we can control people like this without imposing excessive control on ordinary citizens, I'll listen. I'm not just talking about gun control here. I mean the entire bureaucratic structure that would have to exist to monitor those who are potentially dangerous, whatever that means. I'm willing to live in a somewhat more dangerous world to gain the benefit of freedom. You're not. It's that simple.
ReplyDeleteYOU ARE NOT MORE FREE JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN FONDLE YOUR STUPID FETISH OBJECT IN PUBLIC, DUMBASS.
DeleteWe would all be more free with fewer guns. We would be particularly more free without the feeble minded and delusional having easy access to firearms.
I'll leave it to you to guess who I mean,and what I think of the loopholes that make it all to easy for guys like this to walk into a gun show and make a gun purchase, no questions asked from people like you.
Your very definition of freedom is a flawed concept.
How would you keep this guy from getting a gun? Let's say that your proposal gets passed--universal background checks required on all sales of firearms. Are you suggesting that there'd be no black market for guns? Are you suggesting that no guns would come north with drugs and illegal immigrants?
DeleteWhat you can't show is how your proposals will do anything to keep criminals from getting guns. How good citizens will be prevented is obvious. But what about criminals?
You do realize Greg that being more dangerous means simply being more dangerous. There is nothing inherently more free because a situation is more dangerous.
DeleteWe are more free when we don't have to live, think, acti and feel without being in fear, where we can act without that limitation without that imposition, without that pressure of fear determining our behavior.
Because you are so pathetically inept at critical thinking you consistently make false comparisons, false definitions, false analogies.
When we act reasonably to stop some people from imposing their bad and dangerous lifestyles - like carrying guns - on the rest of us, the majority of us who do not arm ourselves with lethal weapons to go to the bathroom or go to the post office or to walk our dogs, WE don't have to worry about whether or not you are sane, or logical (as you are not), or impaired, or angry or otherwise emotionally unstable.
We are not at the mercy of having our thoughts and actions dictated to us by having to accomodate your bad behavior, or even your good behavior. YOU and your damned guns are intruding on the rest of us, because your lot go off and kill or injure people every damned week with suicides, murder suicides, homicides, and accidents. Additionally to your own actions,your damned guns end up in the hands of criminals either because you give, sell, trade or otherwise allow them to do so. You object to keeping them safe and secure from that happening, you object to regulation and testing and background checks.
YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. YOU ARE PART OF THE FALSE GUN MYTHOLOGY THAT STROKES YOUR DAMNED EAGO INTO THINKING YOU ARE SOMEHOW HEROIC WHEN IN FACT YOU ARE STUPID AND PATHETIC.
When I see someone carrying a gun in public, I automatically think - ah, small brain, and compensating for a small penis (or the equivalent lack of confidence). When I see photos of someone who sticks guns in their belt in a dangerous fashion, I think , ah, REALLY REALLY small brain that doesn't understand basic safety, and tragically desperate need to pretend to be heroic in order to lie to themselves about who they really are.
So when you carried a handgun for your self defense, you had penis envy? Has your brain made much growth since then? Your attitude is that you can do no wrong and we can do no right. But keep it up. You're a perfect illustration of what is wrong with your side.
DeleteNo.
DeleteI had a permit to carry. I didn't carry. Further, I have consistently made the distinction between people who carry because they have some weird and disproportionate or unreasonable fear, and those who carry either because they have a hazardous occupation that makes it necessary, OR because they have a limited and specific objective and immediate threat that necessitates doing so, one that is affirmed by law enforcement and courts - as my case was, unlike the carry you engage in.
You are a perfect continuing example of the misrepresentation by your side of reasonable gun regulation and consistent dishonesty, and a lot of consistent stupidity as well.