arma virumque cano (et alia)
Sounds like Cormac made a good move by divorcing her. Hope the BF washed his hands afterwards.
Pooch, what happened to your strongly held belief that women have a right to theirown body? Wait until your other anti-gun suck friends hear about this hypocrisy..What a joke.orlin sellers
You ask really weird questions--this has nothing to do with her reproductive rights.I seriously wonder what type of mentally defective you are.
You silly puppy,, Pooch, A vagina is part of her reproductive parts and whatever she decides to put in that warm, wet hole is her business and besides, I can't even count the number of times you and your playmates have called a gun a penis substitute.And wasn't it Englishman John Lennon who declared, "Happiness is a Warm Gun:?orlin sellers
The real point of the post was not where she pulled the gun out of but what she did with it once she did.
That's a good one, a real knee-slapper, MB. I've been coming here for at least two years and cannot recall one other post of yours where someone merely pointed a gun at someone else.Say what you will, the thing had traction only because of the vagina holster.orlin sellers
Mikeb, you just can't conceive of the possibility that we just don't care about every bizarre incident that you dredge up. This is a case of idiots being idiots. So?
The site lying coward doesn't care about the thousands of incidents posted by this site, especially the death of children. The incidents are so high in number, they are not bizarre, they have become regular.
Orlin, I think we've had a story or two about illegal brandishing. Greg, the obvious point is among you so-called law-abiding gun owners there are too many idiots. Why do you want to protect them?
I don't, Mikeb. But what I do insist on is that you don't get to put an official label of idiot on someone before the person acts in an idiotic manner. And you don't get to punish someone before the person commits a crime.
Greg the site lying criminal coward has stated his criminal leanings and stated he will break the law. He and TS claim an oral threat is not against the law. Wrong, but typical thinking from criminals.
I said the exact opposite. Many times, actually. Furthermore, if Greg did threaten someone on this blog, it was written, not oral.
I never said that oral threats are not against the law. What I did say was that the police too often don't take them seriously.
Another bullshit lie from the cowardly, criminal, liars. They both said oral threats are not criminal threats. Check it.
TS and I are supposed to be cowards and liars, but we're the ones willing to look at evidence of what we're supposed to have said. Anonymous refuses to offer that evidence.
Don't have to, your lying comments are there for all to see. I always let liars own words speak for themselves. No need to make anything up. I can see why the lying criminal coward has been banned from other sites.
Laci, given your uncontrolled rage and threats that you've made, you certainly shouldn't own guns.
As for you, I wonder if you really do teach English. You have idea of what a non-sequitur is.If you did, you would realise that is pretty much what your posts are.But, keep 'em coming, Greggy. We love watching you make an idiot of yourself.Seriously, you think you could actually write a scholarly acceptable translation of Parlement of Fowles. I doubt you would get near any of the actual manuscripts since you would have to show some academic merit to do so.Or did you think it was Parlement of Fooles?
Greg has stated his criminal intent and promotes criminal behavior. He certainly should not have a gun.
A non-sequitur: something that does not follow. That's the essence of your arguments. Your achievements consist of getting thugs out of charges and perpetrating British atrocities on the Irish.
The site lying coward has stated that revenge is justice. A criminal like that is calling someone else criminal? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
The post is about a dangerous and unfit gun owner and what she did. Yet, two out of three comments so far attacked the poster. What's wrong with you guys? Do you disagree with the point made?
Of course, MikeB would get it.And the two idiots would miss the point all together.I guess they are lost when things go outside the scope of the talking points their masters give them since they are incapable of independent thought.
Mikeb, whenever Laci posts something, the subject is him. He's stuck on himself and his illusion of superiority. Typically, I couldn't care less about what he calls a point.
Wrong, whenever Laci posts something it sure to be something you oppose and being a petty infantile man, you attack him personally instead of arguing the point.
He goes on and on about things that are irrelevant, and whenever anyone takes issue with what he says, he only flies into a rage or makes threats. That's when he actually responds. And that's the point. He rarely takes part in the discussion. When he's ready to participate like a rational member of the conversation, I'll answer what he has to say.
You never answer anything. You do find idiotic excuses to not respond to questions about what you wrote (your own words) Rage? Why did you rage at Sally (a new commenter to you) and call her names, then later called her a liar?Irrelevant? Another lie by the site criminal lying coward.