Friday, December 14, 2012

Lawful Florida Gun Owner Shot by Police (Warning Penis Joke Involved)

 Local news reports

An early morning argument between a Palm Beach Shores man and a woman next door over the small size of his manhood sparked a police shooting that left the man wounded and facing years in prison, Gossip Extra has learned. 

Police sources tell me Adam Brown, 45, was swimming naked in the pool of the El Coqui apartment complex about 2:30 a.m. yesterday when a female neighbor started trash-talking about his penis.

“She said something about it being really small,” said one investigator at the scene who asked not to be named. “So, he just got out of the pool, still naked, walked into his apartment and came out with a rifle.”

Brown allegedly knocked on the door of the woman, identified as Jenny Arroway, after she retreated inside. When she opened, the source said he pointed the rifle at her face, then ”he told her: ‘How do you like the size of this?’”

I've noticed that pro-gun folks frequently accuse gun control folks of making penis jokes.  So frequently that, in fact, the accusations actually outnumber the offensive jokes themselves.

Rarely do we have a news story about gun misuse that actually contains the famous joke.

For me, the emphasis on this story is not the guy's dick size, but the fact that he was another lawful gun owner who resorted to bullying behavior with a gun when pressured.  I suppose the iceberg-theory which they apply to DGUs applies here as well.  95% of these incidents do not get reported.  The ones that make the news are a tiny fraction of what's actually happening.

What's your opinion?  Please leave a comment.


13 comments:

  1. I wonder if the "gun rights" movement itself is simply a method of compensation? They fear disarmament, as it would deprive them of their mean of compensation. They oppose gun control laws as they would feel inadequate, castrated, and incomplete without the presence of a firearm.

    If one substitutes genitalia with arms, then if someone where to control an army, does that imply that they are more "masculine" than you? After all, if a rifle is compensation for penile mass, how much compensation is a MiG 21 worth?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Among the many errors that you make, one that shows up repeatedly is your insertion of an "h" into the subjunctive mood form of the verb, to be.

      Regarding the rest of your comment, you're trying to insert something tiny where it's not wanted.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mikeb302000:

    So, what? You're tellin' me that you never went swimmin' nekkid in a community pool and had your junk shrivel up cuz' the water was like, "brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!"? Then, there you are, just mindin' your own business (well, maybe breakin' a stoopit law about public nudity, but it's a BAD law) and, THEN, this slut starts taunting you.

    That gal shoulda offered to help him; stead, what's she do--she makes fun of his manhood, that's what! Hey, I'da had a little "talk" with her, too. Serves her right for shootin' off her mouth and makin' fun of that poor guy who was just pleasurin himself, I mean, havin' a good time in that pool.

    Damned good thing he wasn't barbecuin' nekkid, she'da prolly started in on him about how to cook a porkchop!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This story is a parody of beliefs of anti-gun folks. I have always known that gunsucks have sexual problems. It's good to see confirmation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous @ 2:38PM:

    I don't care if you're rude. I don't care whether you are rational. I think it's fine to make fun of gunzloonz. You should however, find a handle and use it, so that we know whether we have one of you or a whole mess of sockpuppets from somebody. Just a thought.

    Carry on insulting the gunzloonz.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ninety-five percent of incidents in which a thug threatens a good citizen with a gun go unreported? Because that's what we have here. The man was already committing one crime, and he added some more to the first.

    You call him a lawful gun owners, but you have no evidence of that. Unlike your claims about gun accidents, there's proof that people who act like this often have done other bad things in the past.

    But let's imagine that he's never committed a crime before this night. How would you identify him as someone who would do this at some point in the future? Given the number of gun owners in this country and the number of first-time buyers lately, how are you going to supply enough shrinks to test all of them?

    This is Mikeb's version of a jobs program.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lawful gun owner means never having been CONVICTED of a felony. Must I remind you again about the innocent-until-proven-guilty thing.

      Delete
    2. But why do you feel the need to add useless adjectives all over the place? As you say, all are lawful until they commit a crime. Why don't you include "human" and "American" and "breathing" to the description?

      You keep saying that you don't want to take away all guns, but you make snide remarks about lots of gun owners, and you lay out implications in your "lawful gun owner" titles that tell us that you don't trust any gun owner. Your proposals and attitudes add up to one thing: You want to ban private ownership of guns. You may not want to admit it, but the total effect of everything you ask for would be to make owning guns legally all but impossible. That's a de facto ban.

      Delete
  7. The reason the gun fanatics so often bring up the penis jokes is a good bit of diversion in and of itself. They don't want anyone to think beyond the jokes and realize it's all a metaphor for mental inadequacy. It's not that they're lacking physically, they're lacking psychologically. Otherwise they wouldn't own and carry guns - for the most part, there are exceptions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, of all the penis comparisons that I've seen, it's been gun control freaks who make them. My side might make a joke here and there, but it's yours that is going all Freudian on the subject.

      Delete
  8. "But why do you feel the need to add useless adjectives all over the place? As you say, all are lawful until they commit a crime. Why don't you include "human" and "American" and "breathing" to the description?"

    I don't know about mikeb302000 but I'm pretty sure that being ""human" and "American" and "breathing"" are all factors that we have no control over, unless we decide to kill ourselves at which point we will become spoiling meat. Hazzing teh gunz, otoh, is pretty much voluntary, nobody forces them on you unless you join the military or some similar organization.

    Yeah, us nongunzloonz fetishize all sorta stuff. I mean, I'll just bet that there's a website out there with thousands of pix of guys' lawnmowers or laptops, complete with a full range of accessories and information on how to soup them up and make them go faster and, like, other stuff, yeah, that's the ticket. NOT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't spend much time on the Internet, I take it. There are groups to discuss all kinds of interests. I've seen lots of boards talking about all manner of computer topics. I've even seen websites devoted to tractors. Cars? Hooboy, what a long list there.

      Delete